this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
36 points (97.4% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
336 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In Britain after WWII there was a severe housing shortage and the solution they came up with was "row houses" basically large apartment blocks. The genius part of this was along with this you also got an allotment. A small parcel of land where you could garden and enjoy the outdoors.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Guns4Gnus@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, we had that here in Canada too, until the PCs and Libs killed it in the 1980s.

Before Mulroney pulled it, the CMHC would actively invest in housing start ups.

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

I think we still have them in Quebec, called "maison de ville", they are in rows and you have like a 30'x20' as a backyard.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Back when the government arbitrarily decided that every public service must make positive income or be cut.

The 80s were fueled by cocaine and revenue.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't sound like the libs core m-o. Maybe, like this pipeline fiasco, they were convinced it would make the PCs their friends, and it failed as miserably then too?

[–] nueonetwo@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cons under Mulroney began the cuts to social spending to balance the books, libs under Chretien finished it off.

The idea was that the government shouldn't have a hand in housing and it should be left to the free market.

[–] nicktron@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, the idea was that the federal government should keep their noses out of it and let the provinces handle it, much like healthcare.

[–] Guns4Gnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

And we've all seen since then that the provinces won't do a damn thing if they don't have a fire lit under their asses.

See: Carbon offset taxes.

Canada went with "victory houses" we built about a million units 1942-48.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

My grandparents had a council house in the UK, thankfully the allotmemt was just an extended back garden/yard. It was affordable housing for a family of 8.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I think countless 3-5 storey steel-concrete multi-unit buildings are preferable from density, comfort (sound and heat insulation) and durability standpoint.

[–] Splitdipless@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We need more of building for the middle, like the Barbican in the UK. https://youtu.be/FFDpqRxym_A?feature=shared

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/FFDpqRxym_A?feature=shared

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

We call them terraced houses, and just to clarify, they've been around for a lot longer than that.

I've got records of my family living in a terraced house in the 1881 census, and possibly earlier :)

[–] christopherius@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

There are a few in my city. Not sure how affordable they are though. I don't plan on buying a house