this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
74 points (95.1% liked)

News

23300 readers
3400 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
74
US state department report absolving Israel on Gaza aid is false, says ex-official (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 5 months ago by dhcmrlchtdj__@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

There was a post just the other day about how the State Departments intelligence department was the best ever and it's always right and never does anything that's ever wrong, just compiles these reports...

But this bit is clearly wrong by now:

The NSM-20 report found that it was “reasonable to assess” that Israel had used US weapons in a way that was “inconsistent” with international humanitarian law, but that there was not enough concrete evidence to link specific US-supplied weapons to violations.

The recent bombing of a refugee camp in Raffah has been confirmed to have been committed with US supplied munitions.

So even if Biden's admin wants to try and say it was true back then, there's no indisputable evidence of it, and motherfuckers are still not doing anything.

I'm not holding my breath for them to do the right thing, but at this point the only thing I'm holding is my vote for Biden.

I wish it hasn't come to this, but moderates have shown time and time again that they're not willing to engage in civilized conversation about what voters want.

But goddamn do they respond quickly to demands. We have to start negotiating with them by whatever means they listen to, and Biden only responds to demands and threats. He's even responding to recent protests like trump did to BLM protests.

I just hope Biden wants to beat Trump more than he doesn't want to at least pause the genocide till the election is over.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

That bit was clearly BS even before the pictures of SDB tails. I mean, there's no way Israel made all of those 2000 lb bombs and kits themselves, they buy from us.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It was my comment, and you’re misrepresenting it. I said it’s the responsibility of POTUS to abide by its findings rather than outside information. I also said Biden should be pressing Blinken for a reassessment, especially after the recent “accidents” involving civilians.

The point of that comment was to combat the disinformation in your previous comment, as well as in your comment above. POTUS does not make decisions on international affairs based on the news or polls.

This should absolutely prompt Biden to force a reevaluation from the State Department.

Also, would you mind providing a source regarding your claim of Biden dispatching a DHS militia to violently suppress protesters? Or did he suggest shooting them in the legs?

[–] homura1650@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

Maybe I'm too used to deciphering GovSpeak, but the report does not obsolve Israel of anything.

The article quotes the report in saying:

[The department does not] currently assess that the Israeli government is prohibiting or otherwise restricting the transport or delivery of US humanitarian assistance [in Gaza]

However, that is a very selective quote, that is not at all what the report says.

The actual quote reads:

While the USG has had deep concerns during the period since October 7 about action and inaction by Israel that contributed significantly to a lack of sustained and predictable delivery of needed assistance at scale, and the overall level reaching Palestinian civilians – while improved – remains insufficient, we do not currently assess that the Israeli government is prohibiting or otherwise restricting the transport or delivery of U.S. humanitarian assistance within the meaning of section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act.

Which translates into: "Israel is definitely obstructing the delivery of humanitarian aid. However, since US law says that puts restrictions on us, we talked to our lawyers who found a way for us to say that they are not"

They are not even being subtle about it. The only way the state department could have been any clearer would be to say "current policy is a clear violation of the Foreign Assistance Act". And a US agency is never going to say that.