this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
161 points (97.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9628 readers
955 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ConfidentLonely@lemmy.world
Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
toaster@slrpnk.net
161
Global sales of polluting SUVs hit record high in 2023, data shows | Half of all new cars are now SUVs, making them a major cause of the intensifying climate crisis, say experts (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 5 months ago by lnxtx@feddit.nl to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago (3 children)

There's easier, more effective battles to fight. People aren't giving up their SUV's, and they are a symptom of a bigger problem anyway. Good public transportation could eliminate millions of cars, roads, and road maintenance.

A few other ideas:

  • Coal power is disgusting and doesn't even make sense economically anymore.
  • Cruise ships and mega yachts should flat out be banned. They use a ton of energy and dump sewage right into the ocean
  • Heavily tax gas powered lawnmowers. They have a surprisingly large environmental impact because they have no pollution controls and often burn a mixture of oil and gas.
[–] grue@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago

The increase in SUVs isn't driven by people's natural preferences; it's driven by automakers being incentivized by stupid CAFE standards to push SUVs on them. Those bad regulations are what we need to fix.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Cruise ships and mega yachts should flat out be banned. They use a ton of energy and dump sewage right into the ocean

Finally, someone who speaks my language

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Also bunker fuel being burned in ocean shipping. Since there very little regulation they burn some of the worst sulfur-emitting fuel. A single container ship emits the equivalent of ~~something like a few hundred thousand~~ every car on the planet, ~~as I recall~~

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The biggest container ships produce more emissions than every car on the planet. Granted, I think there's at most a half dozen of those in operation, but that's still 6x more than every car on Earth.

I remember hearing that during COVID lockdowns the first year, an estimated 50% of cars were off the road and total annual emissions dropped 2%.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is there a souce for that?
It doesnt seem consistent with this one
https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-from-transport

but this is limited to CO2 emissins, so i'm wondering what type of emissions are being counted is there any data on that.

I had a quick look at the "all GHG" data in EDGAR and that also seems to shows road transport quite a lot larger than shipping.
But I'd need to spend a bit longer looking at the data to figure out if i'm using it correctly.

Could it be based on Particulate matter emissions??
PM emissions don't do much if anything to directly intensify climate change - not like GHGs

[–] chocoladisco@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah it really doesn't seem to track with my knowledge in regards to shipping efficiency. AFAIK those big ass container ships are on par if not more efficient than a train.

[–] ConfidentLonely@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I just found that the 16 largest Ships emit as much as all cars. Did not check the source further.

But that really depends on how you measure and define pollution. As others have pointed out container ships are still pretty efficient. But of course they should get better too. Like everything!

Source: https://cedelft.eu/publications/the-basic-facts-how-do-the-emissions-of-ships-and-cars-really-compare/

As I have said, I did not fact check it further because it is quite late here. Just wanted to give information to that claim and please correct your statement (:

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago

Appreciate it, because you and I probably read the same stats but I was pulling it from memory from whenever I heard it (like 7-10 years ago).

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Thank you, fixed.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 5 months ago

This entire article is quotable, but this one stuck with me: "The analysis, by the International Energy Agency, found that the rising emissions from SUVs in 2023 made up 20% of the global increase in CO2, making the vehicles a major cause of the intensifying climate crisis."

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Gas too cheap?

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Public transport too shitty.

Waking out the door 90 minutes before bus arrives, then having to jog in work clothes after arrival to get to shift on time, and waiting an hour after work because the closest scheduled bus leaves 10 minutes before shift end. All of this being a good day with no delays.

Biggest fucking gift to the oil companies. Impossible option for many who aren’t a single person with no kids.

[–] msage@programming.dev 7 points 5 months ago

It's not a gift TO the oil companies, but FROM them.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

This. I spoke to our mayor about it at a city council meeting, and he told me that the bus service was set up to maximize coverage for the people with no other choice, specifically at the cost of desirable stops and frequency.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Probably. I remember during a price spike a few years back, it seemed like fewer SUVs were on the road.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Can we add The Guardian to a tabloid ban? These articles are shit. They can't even cherry pick their own data consistently.

  1. the graph in the article shows SUV sales are still less then cars. Fine print: only in rich countries

  2. to even come close, they have to lump in EV SUV's, which doesn't add to the CO2 they are complaining about.

  3. ahhhh it takes more effort to counter bad journalism which is why it's so prevalent but here a rundown:

• 20% CO2 production is for conventional SUV's. This doesn't include electric which has the highest adoption rates.

• More EV vehicles are classified and built as SUV's due to weight, limiting adoption of electric cars, but is still increasing at 55%

• Carmakers don't necessarily want bigger and heavier cars; that is more material to buy. They want to make what sells and bigger, heavier cars have better crash test ratings.

Just more churn from the incite and radicalize machine: The Guardian.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Carmakers don't necessarily want bigger and heavier cars; that is more material to buy.

But it's higher margins, and they can phase out lower margin vehicles by marketing them less and producing fewer of them.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

perceptions that they are more comfortable

I gotta say, as a big and tall guy who’s developing bad knees, SUVs are more comfortable. So nice not having to bend my knees so much while struggling to find extra joints in my neck and back to get in. Same with the wider thing - so happy to no longer knock heads getting in at the same time as a passenger - so happy not to knock shoulders. So happy to have adequate leg room (I think it was a Volvo C30 I tried where my shoe literally didn’t fit. My feet aren’t even all that wide but I literally could not press the gas without also pressing the brake) and have that leg room in front of me rather than off to the side somewhere. That might be just me though

Unless you’re talking full sized truck-based SUVs. Then no

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Most car based SUVs and Sedans are built on the same platform. The interior dimensions on both will be virtually identical.

so happy to no longer knock heads getting in at the same time as a passenger

I'm legitimately struggling to understand this. Do you get in head first? How are you getting your head that far into the car getting in that you can hit the passenger? Do you hold onto the roof, stick your head/torso in, then maneuver your butt into the car?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Somewhat the opposite but when the door opening is too small to contort enough to get in sort of vertically, something has to go first. It’s almost funny that a human spine is all joints, but there’s just no way to bend my neck or back enough to get in some cars “normally “. Anyway, butt in first, all the way to the far bolster so there’s room to get my neck and head in, lift and shift to straighten out, bonk heads. It doesn’t help when the car is narrow enough to come close to touching shoulders when sitting normally. I didn’t entirely realize how many adjustments I made to get into some cars until now got my Forester, and suddenly everything was so much easier - a car for adults instead of a Fisher-Price Mobile. Suddenly a door opening tall enough to enter vertically, wide enough so the seat is not behind the B pillar, and enough ground clearance to make it much easier on the knees. It’s still a bit narrow but at least there’s shoulder space

The thing is I’m not that big or tall. So many people are so much bigger and taller and I just don’t understand how they do it. I blame a combination of safety regulations making the B pillar bigger and more central and front door opening smaller, and evolving design more exactly fitting whatever a standard human is. Older cars were definitely more forgiving

[–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

It's not like most of the population can fit inside a generic hatchback...

I get that bigger cars make sense for some people, but definitely not majority.