this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
64 points (98.5% liked)

Apple

17481 readers
163 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] infotainment@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Really hoping the EU finally forces Apple to open up their devices and we can be done with their nonsense. Let me use real Firefox on my iPad already!

[–] randomaccount43543@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apple is legally required by the EU Digital Markets Act to allow 3rd party app stores on iOS by March 2024

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Markets_Act

[–] Resolved3874@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

And that will probably only ever apply to the app store in the EU.

[–] jollins@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would too but when it happens it’ll probably only apply to EU users

[–] sky@lemmy.codesink.io 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, can't say I have much hope they'll allow sideloading everywhere, as much as I'd love it. Their restrictions around adult and cannabis-related apps are so silly.

[–] BoomBoomLemon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is not going to be popular but Apple’s walled garden is why I am a customer. The fact that they don’t carry decades of baggage into to their ecosystem is a benefit. Did I hate that I had to leave a perfectly fine 2012 iMac because no more updates and missing features? Sure, but I got a decade out of one computer.

They control the hardware and software in a tightly integrated manner that works great. People who complain about this not being open… you’ve got other options. To me, it’s a product differentiator.

Before someone says I’m not capable of using a “real” OS, I ended up here in 2007 due to OSX with its *nix backend. I started time sharing on a VAX8800, built a career on Sun stuff, jumped to Linux in 1994 doing development (submitted driver updates, FAQs and more). I’ve never looked back and I’m certain I am as efficient and productive as I can be. I use Linux and Windows as well but for different things.

[–] sebi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I get your point, but third-party app stores are optional. You can still only download apps from THE App Store.

And I get what you mean, when it comes to the longevity of devices. I feel like this will change in the future, but time will tell.

[–] BoomBoomLemon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I sometimes get annoyed with Apple and the App Store policies, I also view this as a differentiator. It’s arguably more secure. It’s a trade off I can live with.

It will be interesting to see how Apple plays out the third party store.

[–] Skiptrace@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sigh

Apple, please just stop...

[–] ThrowThrowThrewaway8@vlemmy.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Apple just became the first company in history to surpass $3 TRILLION in value. Something tells me you don’t get there unless you’re the type of company that won’t “just stop” lol

[–] lando55@vlemmy.net 4 points 1 year ago

I can relate to both sides of this fight, but to lend my POV on Apple's stance, they have a valid argument.

When you sign the developer agreement and submit an app to the App Store, you are entering into a contract to make concessions to Apple's business model, and Epic clearly violated these T&Cs.

If Epic truly wanted to institute change in App Store policies in order to maximize their profits from Fortnite, they would have first engaged Apple to initiate the discussion and work towards an amicable solution, which Apple would likely flat out deny. It's at this point that Epic could have used its substantial presence in the industry to rally the developers, the press, and its own user base to stand up to Apple policies and effect that change.

As it stands, their decision to wait for their assured dismissal from the App Store to pursue litigation and position themselves as trying to "stand up for indie developers" comes off as insincere and primarily seeking publicity based on Apple's action in simply abiding by its own long established policies.

Note: While I am primarily a Mac user in my personal life, I tend to be very critical of Apple's business practices in general, and while I have my own negative opinions about Fortnite's transactional model, I try to be unbiased in my response to their actions and subsequent behavior.

load more comments
view more: next ›