this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
12 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm at a loss for words with this

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 63 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How have I never heard that Elon has 11 fucking kids? Every bourgeois "hero" pushing this movement deserves wall-flipped .

If decreasing birth rates are scaring you so much for the future of humanity, as if you ever really gave a shit about it, then stop enslaving the working class to the point that they have no time or money for kids.

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 38 points 5 months ago

Capitalists heighten contradictions. They don't solve them. Proletarianization destroys the productive basis for the nuclear family while the capitalist state upholds it as an institution. Only the socialist state can resolve this contradiction with socialized childcare & childrearing, children's autonomy, abolition of marriage, etc. (sorry USSR you didn't go far enough). The capitalist solution is reaction, a return to 19th century working conditions, family relations, and religiosity that saw high birth rates. Unfortunately that all existed within the context of things, so it's probably impossible to recreate at large scale.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's the definition of a non-problem. Oh no, there won't be enough children to care for you in your old age? So? Suffer and die like literally every other human ever. Manufacturing new people to drive you to dialysis is fucking weird. Just... acept your mortality with at least an iota of dignity.

[–] Yllych@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Actually if we rearranged our productive modes we could absolutely care for the elderly instead of abandoning people to die a la social murder

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 56 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Save the world from what? Climate change? Even ol' Elon has jumped in on the climate change denial trend.

And why do I think every single one of them wants to sterilize anyone who isn't 100% white?

[–] GladimirLenin@hexbear.net 48 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They're worried about the non-whites

[–] SwitchyWitchyandBitchy@hexbear.net 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Eugenics has always been about genocide against the other. I honestly think if birth control was only available for colored people then conservatives wouldn't have a problem with it. Abortion too. Liberals and even well meaning progressives will sometimes fall into the trap of pitching abortion and birth control as a part of the solution to poverty. Not realizing that they're actually saying the poors aren't allowed to have family.

Edit: I don't like how I worded this but I'm also finding it hard to express what I've observed and the problems I've noticed with it. I'm very much for access to birth control and abortion for everyone. The issue I have is when people want to discourage people from having kids if they're not wealthy as a part of solving poverty. And somehow I get the feeling that the bar is often high for low income black and brown people. Like the aspiration towards progressivism is there but there's still some unchecked racism and classism leading towards support if eugenics. Not to mention I see a lot of support for out and proud eugenics against disabled people and neurodivergent people.

[–] Dirt_Possum@hexbear.net 27 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Liberals and even well meaning progressives will sometimes fall into the trap of pitching abortion and birth control as a part of the solution to poverty.

But access to abortion and BC does help alleviate poverty. When women are unable to choose to not have unwanted pregnancies and children, it does create a serious strain on them and their community, exacerbating poverty and everything associated with it. That isn't some idealist liberal delusion, it's very well documented reality.

Edit, adding:

I honestly think if birth control was only available for colored people then conservatives wouldn't have a problem with it. Abortion too

It's just the opposite. One of the main reasons reactionaries tend to be so anti-abortion is because forcing women to have unwanted children helps to perpetuate poverty, locking communities into a cycle of impoverishment they can't escape. Meanwhile, those who are rich and white have access to abortions whether they're illegal or not, which is by design. If a rich old gammon-chud's daughter gets pregnant and she doesn't want to keep it, he's likely to help her quietly get an abortion even as he ensures people of color never have that kind of opportunity. Wealthy white people want (and generally have) the freedom to do whatever they want while they simultaneously limiting the freedoms of poor BIPOC people, all to maintain or strengthen the white supremacist system.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I honestly think if birth control was only available for colored people then conservatives wouldn't have a problem with it. Abortion too.

No, if the poor POC population dries up, so does their cheap labor. But they just want more bourgeois to keep the poors from out-populating them in revolutionary numbers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 49 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is not Quiverfull, the fundamentalist Christian belief that large families are a blessing from God. The Collinses are atheists; they believe in science and data, studies and research. Their pronatalism is born from the hyper-rational effective altruism movement...

yeah ok there it is. technofascists, like the real ones.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

i can't wait for these two tentative allies to kill each other

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 42 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The wall is too good for these freaks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] micnd90@hexbear.net 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

As of 2024, they have four children. They are, by order of birth: Octavian (son), Torsten (son), Titan Invictus (daughter), and Industry Americus (daughter).

The state of these poor kids, especially the state of the last two names

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 5 months ago

they're objectifying their own children by seeing them as the means to fulfill some weird ideological goal. Reading their kids names definitely adds proof to that. Who names their child "Industry Americus"??? WTF? They sound like product releases from some weird Silicon Valley company.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I had thought the main thing that made it hard was that it’s now so incredibly expensive to raise children.

“No,” Malcolm says. “Not at all.”

barbara-pit

Also, wasn't corporate-art into this shit, too?

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

CEOs and non-profit entrepreneur

so, they run a vulture capital enterprise that has a tax evasion subsidiary.

if they don't end up in prison for fraud, one of their kids is gonna shoot them with one of their mounted guns after seeing a sibling getting smacked one too many times.

[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago

I thought you were just making a tangential Menendez brothers reference, but no they hit their kid in the face in the article

[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

wasn't an article on these people written in american media like nine months ago

EDIT: yeah it was a Chapo reading series in episode 682 Longpsermism from November 2022, so I was off by like a year

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've definitely read about them before. I remember because they are impossibly repellent in every way

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frank@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago

The Yuddites/Effective Altruists/Quakers before the Basilisk/Friends of the Status Quo/Singularity Seekers are a popular topic of scorn here.one of many incredily weird terminally online subcultures we have extremely legitimate beef with.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] Azarova@hexbear.net 35 points 5 months ago

afaik most of them dont even talk to him anymore.

[–] thirtymilliondeadfish@hexbear.net 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The imminent arrival of their fourth child, a girl they plan to name Industry Americus Collins, turns out to be only the first in a string of surprises – and one really shocking thing – that I will encounter during my day with the pronatalists

I can’t read this. You can’t make me

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 21 points 5 months ago

It's okay. You don't have to. There's no pssible advantage that could come from learning about new ways that Yuddites are being weird technofreaks.

[–] Black_Mald_Futures@hexbear.net 24 points 5 months ago

birth rate is such a bad modifer though it's better late game to move on to women's suffrage laws for that +%workforce bonus while focusing on immigration to boost your population

[–] StalinStan@hexbear.net 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Whoever convinced the idle rich to do the opposite of a single child policy to split their family fortune up is a pretty funny bit. A few generations and the rich will breed themselves down to middle class.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago

You remind me of an interesting cultural habit in ancient Ireland, where they would shave off branching families, cutting them from the family name and inheritance to maintain large holdings within the main families.

[–] fox@hexbear.net 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Malcolm and Simone Collins are some of the most moronic people alive. They're both failson inheritors of their parents' wealth and have "jobs" operating their own foundations or some shit. They are actual firm believers in Effective Altruism and nominative determinism, which is why all their kids have fucking stupid names. They're both actual redditors with full bazinga brain.

They genuinely believe their genetics are imperative to pass down because the ability to accumulate wealth is, as far as they're aware, genetic. Their genetics also gave both of them the smoothest brains ever recorded, I'm talking SI standard for frictionless surface.

The one benefit to their harebrained scheme to populate the world with billionaires is that all of their children will be failures from the get-go, having been raised by secular Calvinists, and with so many children their wealth will wither and vanish in a series of unsuccessful artists, honorary MBA entrepreneurships, and the hordes of by-the-hour lawyers each child will hire to wrest pennies from each other's inheritance.

[–] StalinStan@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I mean shit, they have a point. Wealth is largely hereditary

[–] ericatty@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

True, and having large amounts of heirs with no skills or education needs a term like "inheritance imbreeding" since they will end up diluting the wealth-gene pool until they are left with nothing and hopefully go extinct after all the wealth has been absorbed into the general population. Or more likely, absorbed by a grifter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The people that believe they have the greatest genetics in the world to carry the future human race have terrible eyesight and need glasses apparently.

Not that I'm against glasses or anything but you know it's clown shit when people that are naturally blind claim to have the best genetics.

[–] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 20 points 5 months ago

My grandma had 9 kids and didn’t make being a parent her personality….

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 20 points 5 months ago

Lmao fucking freaks. They can do this shit all they want and the national birthrate will still trail behind Guatemala’s.

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago

Those poor kids. At first I was laughing at these dumbasses but the end of the article feels like falling into a pit.

[–] ratboy@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago
[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Giving your kid some kind of nerd ass Latin-sounding "power name" should result in you being forced to eat boiled shoelaces every day until you die

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I hate people who conflate their hatred of children with antinatalism (and people who hate children in general), but I fear pronatalists

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›