this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
90 points (97.9% liked)

3DPrinting

15607 readers
279 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

3d printed threads and snap connectors are nice, but M3 bolts and nuts are more robust and look dope. They also make the model easier todesign print, since you don't have to worry about tolerances as much.

STEP/STL and instructions available here: www.printables.com/model/548770-master-spool

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frostwhitewolf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the purpose of this?

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They've started selling filament without spools to cut down on waste. This is a reusable spool for those filaments.

[–] imgonnatrythis@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who is they and how does this work? Sounds interesting.

[–] Stephen304@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They = quite a few brands so far. The ones I know of include microcenter (inland), fiberlogy, sunlu, and esun. I'm not sure how many are interchangeable but they sell the refills wound onto a cardboard tube/core with a few straps keeping the winds from falling to the side since there are no spool sides to keep it in place. You slot the cardboard core onto your reusable spool sides and once attached you can cut the straps to release the filament.

[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you have to do all this instead of having 2 cardboard circles on the side of the spool. 2 recyclable circles

[–] Stephen304@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's more of a replacement for plastic spools, since cardboard doesn't work well in edge roller spool holders and master spools are almost always reusable plastic which does work in edge roller spool holders. If your spool holders work with cardboard rims then yeah there isn't much of a reason.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the price difference between spool and no spool?

[–] kek_w_lol@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like formfutura filament. Their refills cost like 20 moneys per kg (PLA). Their easyFil PLA is 40. Their brand has the biggest price difference. Usually the difference is up to 5. So still savings.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting. I have a stock pile of filament that I need to burn through first, but I might consider that moving forward.

I think at some point the community should consider simply buying pellets and going straight from pellets to the printer's extruder (no interim filament to make). Pellets are roughly 1/10th the cost of filament so the savings are there, but that's also usually at larger quantities.

I know some large format printer's exist already that use pellets amd that therr are filament extruder out there, but I feel that's the trend for regular hobby grade printer's eventually.

[–] kek_w_lol@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Problem is extrusion consistency. If you want them to be affordable, you need to sacrifice precision. We print with 0.4 mm nozzles, and any inconsistency will show up. Plus the color is less uniform. There are already pellet extruders. Cnc kitchen tested one a while back.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Lol, i actually don't know. I only know it exists. I haven't actually printed anything in awhile but i like to see what other people are making and doing.

[–] frostwhitewolf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nice, I've thrown out so many spools. Esun has sold filament without spools for a while but my supplier seemed to never have stock.

[–] 5ubieee@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this looks sweet, will probs try this next time i need a new spool, looks way sturdier than the one I’m using currently

[–] kek_w_lol@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Just don't try to use it with esun filament. It does not work. Even without the cardboard insert. I tried :(.

[–] 5ubieee@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’ll probably take the step and make a couple different variations with different diameters, I have a couple different brands and I’m sure they all have slightly different diameters :D

[–] kek_w_lol@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Was going to do that but kinda broke rn and my SO is already complaining about the amount of filament :). Please send me a link on printables if you do it.

Most refills follow the master spool standard anyway. Esun just had to be special.

[–] 5ubieee@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I got 2 spools of inland and a couple i got from a generic brand on taobao, I’m pretty sure both are non-standard as well. The last spool I printed off printables had a really nice table with dimensions for a bunch of different filament brands if you’re curious

[–] kek_w_lol@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Master spool standard ftw. Fiberlogy is definitely compatible if you're curious.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Variation in refill winding diameter really put me off the master spool concept a few years ago. I printed a well reviewed spool, bought a refill, and the refill was wound around a smaller radius than the spool so it wouldn't fit. Sounds like that hasn't changed much?

[–] kek_w_lol@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck any manufacturer who makes their own standard. We have one. We don't need a new one. Vote with your wallet. Unless the manufacturer specifies they are compatible, don't buy it. Simple and easy.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the thing, is there even a standard? The thing that got me is everyone saying "master spool", which makes one think that you can print any "master spool" and buy any "master spool refill", but that is not what I experienced.

[–] kek_w_lol@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Master spool standard has mesurements the refill is supposed to fit in. The spool is printable on a 200x200 bed, that's why it's so popular. Every website I have seen, they state ckearly when compatible so idk.

[–] solarbird@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I've printed a couple of spools at different sizes, it's really kind of nice to have them. Particularly smaller spools for smaller sample lengths, super worth it.

But another thing you can do is just print a little single-wall cylinder that friction fits inside one of your existing spools, then cut the existing (non-printed) spool in half down the middle and use the cylinder as a friction-fit sleeve to hold the two halves together. That also gives you the same functionality. It's not as cool but it saves on filament? ^_^