this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
54 points (87.5% liked)

Cool Guides

4685 readers
2 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 30 points 6 months ago

This looks like it's including wildfire related smoke, otherwise, places like Eugene wouldn't be on the list.

Also, "Bay Area" is a city?

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Does this map know where Chico and Reno actually are? Or did the person that made it just kind of guess the area?

Also, cities in valleys would have worse air because air just collects and stagnates there. The real amazement is that any city in a plain or on the coast has horrible pollution close to a valley city. That’s why 4 of the top 7 cities are all within the same valley and a hundred-ish miles of each other.

[–] HaywardT@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Check out Las Vegas just south of Chicago

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

It’s not super clear on this map, but there are two 19s and two 14s. Vegas is in its correct position, but there’s a second 19 as there is another city tied for its score. It should have been clearer, especially given the map setup.

[–] dragThruGardenPlz@midwest.social 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

FYI, neither of the ‘19’s are south of Chicago on this map.

Edit: Judges would have accepted ‘11.’

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why is New York not even on the map?

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I was wondering that myself. But

PM2.5 concentration in New York City is currently 1.1 times the WHO annual air quality guideline value

We seem to be right in line with guidelines. Now, does that account for brake dust? If it does, that’s beyond shocking. So many goddamn cars here, all in stop and go traffic constantly. Just turn off the goddamn cars, people. Wtf are you even doing? You’re almost killing me on my bike every day and you just don’t look happy. Not to mention, I ride past 100 of you and get to where I’m going faster than you do. You have a problem. Admitting it is the first step.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 months ago

Seems a bit suspect to me. "Bay Area" isn't a city. It IS a metropolitan area but contains over 100 municipalities. Let's see how that compares, apples-to-apples.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I have done many cross country trips, the smog in Phoenix in recent years is so not surprising but unexpected at the same time. Why that city continues to grow evades me considering the accelerating water/climate crisis.

[–] Dempf@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

I'm surprised that Salt Lake City isn't on this list, though I guess it might make sense based on average year round pm 2.5, since SLC will have mostly good days, with a few absolutely terrible days due to inversion, lakebed dust, or wildfires.

[–] 108@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Glad Atlanta isn’t up there.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

California: 8 out of 19 – winning!

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

When the state is perpetually on fire air quality suffers

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago

I mean, what should we be optimizing for here? Is it better to have a sparsely populated, sprawling suburb state? Or is it better to have high density areas (e.g., the Bay Area) with surrounding open space (CA has a lot of pristine & protected wilderness)? CA obviously has both high density areas and some sprawl; but I'm guessing that pollution generated per capita is better in a place like the bay area than in more rural parts of the country on account of being able to walk, bike, or take public transportation places.

Also, as others pointed out, wildfires


not sure how these numbers are generated, but if it's just a simple average than it doesn't capture the health consequences I'm guessing: during wildfires, it's not uncommon to wear an N95 outside, and basically avoid outside if possible (and certainly no exercise outdoors).