this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
75 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
57 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Owl@hexbear.net 44 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It had no knowledge of what face was there originally

There is a 0% chance that whatever AI model you used doesn't have the Mona Lisa in its training data.

[–] casskaydee@hexbear.net 16 points 6 months ago

That's not the same thing as having "knowledge" of it though

[–] Jew@hexbear.net 41 points 6 months ago

AI is so advanced look what it can do:

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 40 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is a perfectly acceptable face

doubt

Yes that's what we want in our art, for it to be "acceptable"

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Most art doesn't rise to that level already. Good if we can crowd out all that samey, meaningless kind of stuff that comes out of AI. New art is what should get handsomely rewarded.

[–] oregoncom@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Spoken by someone who doesn't even have the talent to create "samey meaningless stuff" nor the ability to tell the difference.

[–] Budwig_v_1337hoven@hexbear.net 20 points 6 months ago
[–] wombat@hexbear.net 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

reminds me of Bean: The Movie (1997) when Bean accidentally wipes off the face of Whistler's Mother, and draws a smiley face in its place.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 14 points 6 months ago

acceptable face

[–] Leon_Frotsky@hexbear.net 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why did it give her lipstick? 😭

[–] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 13 points 6 months ago

AI Art models are trained on a billion anime waifu pictures nowadays. It will yassify any female-looking object it finds and give it make-up, big eyes and cartoon features and booba

[–] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 15 points 6 months ago

the art understander has logged on. imagine how depressing it would be to have this guys inner life lol

Death to America

[–] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

this is a perfectly acceptable face

The people behind this tech and who evangelize for it don't have an aesthetic bone in their bodies.

[–] hexthismess@hexbear.net 12 points 6 months ago

This just screams, "Please invest in my shitty program!"

[–] Magician@hexbear.net 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Lol the expression on her face is the most discussed part of the piece and they think just having some AI version would inspire the same discussion.

How sad that their appreciation of art and human creativity is so lacking.

[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 11 points 6 months ago

Countless other feces are possible

[–] oregoncom@hexbear.net 11 points 6 months ago

I thought it was going to be "look how badly photoshop's generative fill mangled the mona lisa lmao". Bazinga self delusion never fails to surpass my expectations. These people will convince themselves they "don't enjoy eating" and pay more money to chug soylent instead of eating. Pathologically contrarian.

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bazinga brains when video game women don't make pee pee hard: wojak-nooo

Bazinga brains when AI makes a beautiful piece of art depicting a woman ugly: so-true

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago

In the future, all art becomes tattooed on middle aged man's belly. If it's not that, it's not in

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago

Dat lazy eye