Well, this blew up.
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
30 points (89.5% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
6629 readers
957 users here now
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
11. No misinformation
NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.
Join our Matrix chatroom
Other communities you may be interested in
- !militaryporn@lemmy.world
- !forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
- !combatvideos@sh.itjust.works
- !militarymoe@ani.social
Banner made by u/Fertility18
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
IEDs are a lot like guns, don't look straight down the barrel, or in this case, don't look it in the eyes.
breaking news: googly eyes included in new military aid package for ukraine
it's been 4 months and it's still not (publicly) known who was behind this incident
Clearly an art lover with a fine sense of irony.
Can I get some background? I'm clueless about what's going on here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Vladlen_Tatarsky
nobody admitted to this incident yet. someone prepared that dude's statue with bomb inside, tricked that woman (darya trepova) into delivering it directly, and the result was one dead, the intended target, and some 30+ injured. don't feel bad for anyone involved: this was a meeting of milblogger with his equally unhinged and genocidal fans, and there's a chance that it was fsb's activity. or maybe someone's else - that place was owned by evgeny prigozhin
bonus: vladlen joked about possibility of bomb inside, but dimissed that because he knew darya