this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
258 points (99.6% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2564 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 27 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Humanitarian crisis for sure.

Tangent. If I was a mad genetic scientist with no ethics, there are a few things I'd do -- engineering a virus to deliver a few "software patches" to our DNA. One of those things would be to engineer the production of cellulase as an enzyme in our digestive system -- so we can get energy from grass and such in an emergency. Probably the Law of Unintended Consequences will make this worse for humanity somehow (Begun the Grass Wars have!). Mosquitos also get blood sucking removed, in an attempt to make them purely pollinating insects. Vote for Troy as mad scientist!

Won't help the hungry in Sudan now, though. So I'm open to better ideas. Sadly, I largely have bad ideas. If I'm on the side of full external military intervention, it would be considered "colonial". It's hard to propose any solution that isn't just "send aid" -- and you don't want to do that because it gets seized by the parties involved to support their conflict. Do we just watch it play out and accept refugees? That's lame -- how many millions will die in each of the above scenarios. Fuck.

[–] gimpchrist@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

If I was a mad scientist with no ethics I would just plant malunggay trees all over Sudan. Invasive species be damned.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not sure if you're interested, but John ~~Wyndham~~ Christopher wrote a book about how all grass in the world dies out (including grasses like wheat) and how it destroys civilization.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_Grass

(Edit: Wrong British sci-fi writer named John who wrote stuff about the end of the world.)

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I think it is more complicated than lacking an enzyme. Correct me if I am wrong but doesn't pretty much everything that eats grass need to do tricks like eating feces, or having multiple stomachs, or chewing cud, or eating gravel to get nourishment out of it?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

There's gotta be more to it than just an enzyme cellulose. Cows need 4 stomachs and chew their cud to digest that stuff.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Well, yeah, bit it would still likely help gain some nutrition from something that would otherwise pass clean through you. Our poops would look more like horse turds than cow pies. Just dense barely digested grass.

[–] wunami@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So....the top priority is to do widespread genetic modifications so people can get a minor or negligible amount of nutrition from eating something most people don't normally want to eat?

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Nope. Just so that you don't starve in a crisis. Grass tastes gross. ;)

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

And horses don't

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 2 points 6 months ago

Data encoding into DNA. Let everybody have a subconscious Wikipedia search engine

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago

Sad. Eating grass is a real thing we can do, and there's evidence to suggest our ancestors had hardware to do it more efficiently.

It's still not something you can do to survive, just survive a bit longer and not feel so ravenous.