this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
61 points (91.8% liked)

World News

32318 readers
944 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Who benefits from improved bilateral relations?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 16 points 6 months ago

I mean, both sides no? That's kind of how that works.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

What a bizarre non-statement. Please, enlighten us, who?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Questions are usually non-statements. How could I enlighten you when I need to ask the question myself?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Fair enough. I mistakenly took it as rhetorical. Definitionally both sides benefit from bilateral relations, but in the case of state actors that isn’t especially revealing on its own.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It's in the name of the thing

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The bisexuals benefit from this? Good for them.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think it's Latvians only, though.