11
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They didn't seem terribly useful, compared to other long projects.

  • Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
  • Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity.
  • Unite humanity with a living new language.
  • Rule passion – faith – tradition – and all things with tempered reason.
  • Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
  • Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
  • Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
  • Balance personal rights with social duties.
  • Prize truth – beauty – love – seeking harmony with the infinite.
  • Be not a cancer on the Earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature.

Basically, a freethinker version of the Ten Commandments tablets.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The listed weights and dimensions are the most useful things to me. Knowing the approximate weight of a kilogram and length of a meter would be incredibly useful when trying to recreate things you find in records

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Openly advocating genocide and eugenics? Yeah, definitely not what I would call useful

[-] gbuttersnaps@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you read "Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity" as eugenics and genocide, I think you might be jumping the gun a bit based on personal biases. Population bottlenecks require you to be very careful about species-wide gene pools. In a population of 10,000, you don't want Cletus reproducing with his first cousin.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Conspiracists attributed nefarious intent on these stones. I learned about them from a podcast that studies conspiratorial thinking. I didn't realize they'd been destroyed. I kinda think I heard that ep after the time when they were bombed, so maybe that was mentioned and I didn't internalize it.

Heads-up: conspiracy people are potentially dangerous. They blew up these stones that were probably pretty trivial / harmless. They have shot people for perceived great-replacement bullshit (synagogs). This shit isn't just amusing and stupid. They're irrational and they can project and cause harm.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

They were quite likely put up by folks that believed the same wack job shit as those that destroyed them.

[-] radix@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

If they were meant to survive nuclear apocalypse, then why did one small non-nuclear bomb bring them down? You'd think they should be better constructed or protected or something.

[-] Anaphylactic_Gock@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 year ago

Elbert County, Georgia. A county with about 20k people in it.

They didn't need to withstand a direct hit. Just the fallout/nuclear winter that would kill most of humanity.

[-] radix@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I see. I guess odds were pretty low that a nuclear bomb would lay waste to a rural town.

As an aside, I wonder why they used so many languages if the nuclear winter survivors would have been rural Georgians like the ones who built the monument. I don't imagine a Russian survivor would ever find themself in the American Deep South without functional airplanes and such.

[-] Anaphylactic_Gock@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

The extra languages are probably to help it act as a sort of rosseta stone to help future archeologists.

[-] Shurimal@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Good riddance for probably wrong reasons. Shame they plan to rebuild this crap. Guidestones for thinly veiled eugenics and genocide, they were. Blergh.

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
11 points (86.7% liked)

Creepy Wikipedia

3835 readers
53 users here now

A fediverse community for curating Wikipedia articles that are oddly fascinating, eerily unsettling, or make you shiver with fear and disgust

image

Guidelines:
  1. Follow the Code of Conduct

  2. Do NOT report posts YOU don't consider creepy

  3. Strictly Wikipedia submissions only

  4. Please follow the post naming convention: Wikipedia Article Title - Short Synopsis

  5. Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails.

  6. Please refrain from any offensive language/profanities in the posts titles, unless necessary (e.g. it's in the original article's title).

Mandatory:

If you didn't find an article "creepy," you must announce it in the thread so everyone will know that you didn't find it creepy

image

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS