this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

News

19 readers
12 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a big stretch of a headline based on what they're quoting. Trump was certainly being his inflammatory asshole self, and seemed to opine on what he thought the Lt Gov should or shouldn't do. I didn't read his words in an intimidating way at all though.

It came off more as a brash "he shouldn't testify because he doesn't know what he's talking about" as opposed to "he shouldn't or else bad things might happen".

[–] dragonist@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The headline literally says “told him not to testify”, not “threatens him to not testify”? Not sure what you’re referring to? What “stretch” are you pointing at?

[–] Realtrain@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think he's just saying the headline is (potentially maliciously) ambiguous. I certainly assumed "told not to testify [or else]" when I read it.

[–] flipht@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

So you're inferring something from a headline.

Any chance the target of these statements might infer the same?

That's how wannabe mob bosses work.

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

yes, exactly what I was thinking

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well, he didn't actually "tell" him not to testfiy. "He shouldn't" isn't the same as "don't"

[–] dragonist@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Fair enough, I can see the gap. It didn’t click for me this morning, apologies.