this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
208 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
1003 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml
208
Youtube-dl website has been taken down by Uberspace following court-ordered ban (alternativeto.net)
submitted 1 year ago by Star@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.ml
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml 84 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All they did was take down the website that links to the GitHub repository. They already tried to have GitHub pull it, and they did but then restored it and setup a legal defense fund for projects in similar situations which seems like a pretty big "fuck you".

This story is a nothing-burger, the equivalent of the blue bucket meme.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks to me it is just MS playing hard to get with Google.

[–] BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article doesn't mention that YouTube/Google were involved at all. It was the record labels that filed the suit.

... has been blocked due to copyright infringement claims by major music labels Sony, Warner, and Universal ...

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, the article is not very good. Main players here are google and gihub. My experience with media is that they often don't publish everything, sometimes because of incompetence sometimes for sponsor money. So we have to use our heads a bit.

Not even mentioning google, not even.asking google what they think of youtube-dl, not even asking MS to comment. Give us at least a question and 'they said no comment'.

Not really good reporting and we got used to that.

[–] BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Why would they mention Google at all? Google can't sue anyone for Copyright Infringement when someone downloads a video off their site, because Google doesn't own the copyrights of the videos.

[–] PolybiusPro@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This seems like it would follow along the same lines as emulators and torrent downloaders. If you don't download anything illegal with it, you're not doing anything wrong. I use this software for work to download good resolution/low filesize copies of my client's videos. Hopefully I can continue using it.

[–] GeekFTW@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All else fails, grab yt-dlp. It's a fork that I tend to find works better than normal youtube-dl anyway.

[–] PolybiusPro@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm actually already using this fork! I do enjoy the level of configuration yt-dlp has

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 26 points 1 year ago

I don't even think you need to go as far as comparing it to emulators and torrent downloaders. It just downloads what's publicly hosted on the web, it's no different from a web browser basically.

[–] masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They should just move it to a non-Western jurisdiction.

[–] YaaAsantewaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

It was a German court apparently, according to the article

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, that would be for the best.

Similar to how certain VPN/Mail clients/journalists (due to leaks) and others are in non-western areas.

I am forgetting some...

edit: word

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

There is some difference between private communication and open source code that smis available to anyone.

[–] nonearther@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There's already a fork

[–] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yt-dlp is an old fork, and very good. It's insanely fast.

[–] masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

isn't yt-dlp the one to use anyway? I heard that youtube-dl is deprecated and dlp is the way to go.

[–] iod@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I believe youtube-dl are just slower at accepting merges. For example yt-dlp were the first to mitigate youtube's speed throttling and idk if the base project has it even now. It's still functional but may be slower.

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's actually multiple forks, and that one's been around for awhile. I actually prefer the version you link, it's been more stable for me.

[–] nonearther@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I didn't mean to say it's a new fork, but that the fork already exists. Maybe didn't form my sentence correctly ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Igotz80HDnImWinning@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

This is the way

[–] vikinghoarder@infosec.pub 16 points 1 year ago

I already pay to access the Internet, put your Ads up the butt. I will contribute to the creators I choose.