this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
111 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7498 readers
4 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It gives me hope for the future of beehaw refederating with that instance. They host some interesting communities. To be clear, I fully support beehaw defederating, it's just heartwarming to see instance admins do things that move things forward

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance.” - Karl Popper

[–] fonix232@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Gotta love the good ole tolerance paradox

[–] druidical@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No paradox there: tolerance is not a moral precept. Relevant quote:

Tolerance is not a moral absolute; it is a peace treaty. Tolerance is a social norm because it allows different people to live side-by-side without being at each other’s throats. It means that we accept that people may be different from us, in their customs, in their behavior, in their dress, in their sex lives, and that if this doesn’t directly affect our lives, it is none of our business. But the model of a peace treaty differs from the model of a moral precept in one simple way: the protection of a peace treaty only extends to those willing to abide by its terms. It is an agreement to live in peace, not an agreement to be peaceful no matter the conduct of others. A peace treaty is not a suicide pact.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I understand what you are getting at, it is literally self-defined as 'the paradox of tolerance' by Karl Popper.

[–] zalack@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not a paradox. Tolerance is a peace treaty, not a moral precept.

We don't call it a "diplomacy paradox" when a country responds to getting invaded by killing the invaders.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't that what Karl Popper, the guy quoted for saying that, calls it though?

[–] LemmyAtem@beehaw.org 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It does seem like .world is trying to corral itself and curb the issues that flared up from their growth, so that's very promising. Meanwhile, shit just works is still an absolute dumpster fire.

[–] Dee_Imaginarium@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually, sh.itjust.works removed their c/thedonald community so they seem to be taking steps in the right direction too. Still probably not time to refederate until more granular mod tools are developed but it's a promising sign.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There's been a vote up in their agora community for over a week now about defederating from the nazi instance. Administrators have done nothing. Not a good look in my opinion

edit: spelling

[–] Dee_Imaginarium@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oof, yeah. That's not great. At least we have Beehaw 🐝🤠

[–] s0phia@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] glitchead@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

This is such an awesomely wholesome moment and it absolutely rocks.

[–] Dee_Imaginarium@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

🤣 I'm glad I could be here to witness your realization lmao

[–] s0phia@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't know how I managed to take so long LMAO

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Beehaw, welcome to the Yeehive

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hellebert@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

The like one dude running sh.it.do.nt.wo.rk is in over his head I think.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Beehaw admins have done a great job of keeping the toxicity to a minimum. I don't regret my choice of home instance.

[–] African_Grey@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It really is the best place to bee 🐝

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Max_UL@lemmy.pro 3 points 1 year ago

? I get nothing but good impressions from shit just works users, content and admins.

[–] DarkWasp@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This was the right call. I’d never been there before and just checked out the announcement post and it’s full of hatred, insults and bile towards this decision. Their users are calling this a “far left instance that hates free speech run by politically correct pussies”. What a nasty community.

[–] Master@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

sh.itjust.works also killed their c/thedonald community. Both of those instances are doing pretty good self moderating and preventing hate. Still dont need to refederate until the tool set gets better but I have accounts on both now and read them as much or more than beehaw.

[–] Lionir@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, they still federate with exploding-heads.. I don't know if I'd say they're doing good at preventing hate, it kinda feels like there was just a lot of pressure to kill c/thedonald.

[–] Dee_Imaginarium@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's still a step in the right direction at least, but yeah, if they don't defederate from that instance it kind of says a lot about their attitudes. I was trying to be optimistic that them removing that community might signal that they're going to defederate from that instance next.

[–] Lionir@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The latest comments I saw from the admin was that they would defederate from instances with hate speech and bigotry (https://sh.itjust.works/comment/476848) but yet there's been no action so while I want to be optimistic, it's a bit hard. Their community already had a discussion about it and it seemed positive that they should defed but no action (https://sh.itjust.works/post/151703).

Hopefully .World defeding will push them to act.

[–] Dee_Imaginarium@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope so too, but at least there's always Beehaw 🐝🤠

Honestly I'd rather refederate with .world before them anyway, at least .world seems to be trying to keep on top of this stuff despite their massive user growth. Looking forward to updated versions of Lemmy where that more granular moderation control is available.

[–] Overzeetop@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I suspect all the big servers are struggling to find footing, and I’m giving a bit of latitude in my opinions. The three mains we’re talking about here pretty much span the spectrum of management styles. It will be interesting to see them evolve.

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My suspicion -- and this is coming out of my behind -- is that rather than being proactive about these things, they're setting themselves up to learn a hard lesson about known troll tactics. They're trying to be all free-speechy and user-decisiony, but spaces like TD just draw people who will not ever actually follow the server rules.

So, they'll keep dancing over this line, giving these communities the benefit of the doubt, only to discover time and again that they don't care about their rules, and they'll have to be banned.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

End of the day, I think TheDude is being a naive idealist. A lot of us can see from 20,000 feet where this will lead, and can't help but be frustrated by this approach. I've seen people assuming the lack of action is a backdoor endorsement, and that TheDude is more than happy to have his instance raided by the nazi instance. I'm uncertain whether I believe that, and heavily lean towards that I do not, instead thinking he's running the 5th fastest growing instance while also falling for the Alt-Right's playbook. He may not want his instance to be a favorite place for nazi sympathizers to hang out, but if he keeps at this, he will foster an environment where it will be a favorite place for nazi sympathizers to hang out

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, exactly.

He's going to be playing wack-a-mole against Nazis while also trying to live up to expectations of the freeze peach crowd, and be left constantly scratching his head as to why the game just keeps on going.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

And it's good, I browsed a little bit the linked comments and their posts, and it's a reason I joined beehaw at first... no extremists, fascists, racists, etc.

I hope also one day beehaw federate again with LW, I had to create an account on LW because they have good communities too.

[–] brewvarlet@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheEntity@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have a noob question. From a technical point of view, why does it matter to server A (beehaw) whether server B (world) federates with C (exploding nazis) or not? Since A is defederated from C, the content should be unavailable anyway. I completely get why a proper moderation of B itself is crucial, but what B federates with should be irrelevant if B itself stays "pure", right? Again, from a technical point of view, because otherwise willingly federating with nazis obviously strongly correlates with allowing nazis inside. To reiterate, how is A directly affected by what B federates with? Is it merely a matter of lobbying or is there some technicality I'm missing here?

[–] CMLVI@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's more just the stance beehaw has in general. They don't want to federate with the Nazi instance, or anyone that wants to do with them. Same way people don't want to hang out with racists, or people who also hang out with racists.

[–] TheEntity@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I do share the sentiment, was just wondering whether there is more to it. I presume the answer is "no" then. (and that's fine!)

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

From a technical standpint, it doesn't matter. The point is more just that it's an indicator of moderation style and what we can hope to see in the future.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The user's comments are also content, and Server A can see threads from Server B, where Server C is trying to radicalize people to Nazi beliefs.

Basically Server C uses Server B's neutrality to spread

And at that point, server A has to rely on Server B moderating for that, or their members still have to see that.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

(watches everyone else talk about their Lemmy and Beehaw accounts)
Uh... I have a Kbin account. Neigh. Neigh.
"WUSS!"

load more comments
view more: next ›