this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
155 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8240 readers
501 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 53 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It is telling that the Ukrainians are hitting logistical targets inside Russia, and the Russians are hitting apartment buildings in Ukraine.

I can't remember where I read it, but somewhere I saw a study which tried to step back and answer the question "does this tactic of killing innocent civilians to break a country's resolve, actually have that effect" and the answer was in almost all cases an absolutely resounding fuck no. As you would expect, it just motivates them more to fight you and win.

Even taking the going-to-hell aspect out of it, and just focusing on Russia trying to win the war, them bombing civilians is a pure and counterproductive waste of munitions and of their own military's time.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Remember when the Nazis bombed London, and the British gave up? Remember when the allies firebombed Tokyo or Dresden and the war ended?

It doesn't work. Really the only time a country was bombed into submission, it took 2 nuclear weapons and the promise of more, and they were already in the verge of losing.

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

"...2 nuclear weapons and the promise of more"

Not to mention 67+ cities firebombed, countless others traditionally bombed.

They held on for a ridiculous amount of punishment

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 8 months ago

Also the population was starving due to the submarine campaign and the aerial naval minelaying wiping out most shipping.

[–] photoncollector@mastodon.social 4 points 8 months ago

@TheMightyCanuck @Tar_alcaran
They were down to 1,000 calories a day by the end of the war, part of it from grasses.

[–] Lupus108@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

it took 2 nuclear weapons and the promise of more, and they were already in the verge of losing.

Some historians argue that the bigger factor was the sowjets preparing to enter the war against Japan and that the nuclear bombs just kind of sped up the decision that was coming anyway.

[–] kiku123@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

I felt the same way when the videos of Russians torturing and killing POWs was going around.

You're just teaching the Ukrainians that they should always fight instead of getting captured.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Fuck the blyats

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

Cut off their funding, good stuff.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Anybody know of any actual data that shows what sort of actual economic damage these attacks are causing? Are there significant fuel shortages etc. (and particularly in the Moscow area)?

[–] photoncollector@mastodon.social 1 points 8 months ago

@IphtashuFitz @LaFinlandia
Moscow doesn't publish Economic statistics.