this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
24 points (96.2% liked)

Voyager

5604 readers
16 users here now

The official lemmy community for Voyager, an open source, mobile-first client for lemmy.

Download on App Store

Download on Play Store

Use as a Web App

Download on F-Droid

Rules

  1. Be nice.
  2. lemmy.world instance policy

Sponsor development! ๐Ÿ‘‡

Number of sponsors badge

๐Ÿ’™

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Really enjoy using this app, & as an Android user, the iOS theme is a nice departure. Only minor gripe would be the battery usage, its quite a bit higher than most of the other apps I've tried. I realise the Android app release is new, so could possibly be optimised a bit more down the road? Thanks for the app, its a winner.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿผ

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] akippnn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Not bad in my opinion.

[โ€“] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you use an app cleaner?

[โ€“] fisco@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I do have one, or clear the cache manually

[โ€“] Sentau@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have personally not seen a big hit to my battery life since I started using voyager a month ago. I haven't looked at at individual app battery usage but the screen on time is similar to before and voyager is one of my most used apps.

[โ€“] fisco@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm referring to the Android app that was released less than 2 weeks ago...

[โ€“] 4z01235@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the same thing as the web version, really. I would not expect there to be any performance (including battery usage) performance since fundamentals it's the same code running the same way.

[โ€“] fisco@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surely the web version is also browser dependant ?

[โ€“] 4z01235@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, so if you choose a browser with a particular bad rendering engine it may give worse performance or battery life compared to the app-packaged version, which uses the system's built-in webview (Google Chrome engine in most cases) for rendering. If you're using a Chromium-based browser to open the web version it should perform just about identical to the app-packaged version since they're the same code and then also executing in the same rendering engine.

[โ€“] fisco@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's all very well, but I wasnt actually comparing the android app to the pwa, its quite understandable that they would be comparable in their efficiency...

[โ€“] 4z01235@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know your original post was talking about Voyager vs other apps you've tried but the whole reason we're this deep in the comment chain is because someone was talking about using Voyager for over a month and you said you're talking about the Android app that came out more recently. If you don't want to compare the PWA vs Android app versions of Voyager, what are we even doing here?

[โ€“] fisco@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Probably best leave it there then..

[โ€“] Sentau@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah I switched to that as well when it came out and I see no battery drain difference between the pwa and the native app. Maybe it is an issue because of the way the software on your phone handles battery optimisation. Could help the dev look into it if you add phone model and Android version(and if it stock or some other rom).

Edit - By specifying your hardware may help you to find out if others with same or similar hardware are also facing the issue

[โ€“] fisco@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its not big issue, was just something I noticed, as it was more than others I've been using, which have more or less been on par with eachother.

[โ€“] Sentau@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Do you have battery usage per hour statistics. You have piqued my curiosity with this statement