this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
444 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3276 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

House Republicans know that their rapidly shrinking majority—and their lack of evidence—has put them in an impossible position.

Despite drumbeating for more than a year to impeach Joe Biden, House Republicans have quietly begun looking for an off-ramp in the face of an overwhelming lack of evidence against the president—and a rapidly shrinking majority in the chamber.

Republicans have accused Biden and his son Hunter of corruption and influence peddling, but their lengthy investigation has failed to turn up any proof of the president’s wrongdoing. In fact, the biggest criminal act revealed during the course of the probe was committed by the GOP’s own star witness, Alexander Smirnov. The Department of Justice has accused him of making up the allegations against the Biden family that jump-started the whole impeachment effort.

As the investigation crumbles, Republicans are starting to sour on it entirely. “I don’t think we have the will to impeach Joe Biden,” Texas Representative Troy Nehls told Fox News on Tuesday. “We just don’t.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 199 points 8 months ago (6 children)

It should not be about will, but about evidence.

[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 127 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Republicans never had facts on anything, so they will not care about them now

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They had plenty of facts according to them until recently, it's just those facts were unsubstantiated lies fed to them by Russian intelligence according to the operative who confessed he was working for Russia when he lied about the info to the FBI that the GOP were crowing about on Fox entertainews as extremely credible.

Still waiting for apologies and resignations from Fox, James Comer, etc.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Conservatives knew the "evidence" was fake. The public at large knew the evidence did not exist. Everyone knew this was all made up, yet conservatives thought they could push this through by sheer will. This was never about evidence for them. This was always dishonest.

A conservative is incapable of honesty. Every word uttered by a conservative is either deception or manipulation. Every word. This has been true throughout history and will not change in our lifetimes.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They probably just assumed if they started an investigation they'd come across something real that they could nail Biden on. After all, that's true for any Republican, and they believe Democrats are just as corrupt as they are.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

That's true. That's why every accusation from a conservative is a confession.

[–] ovalofsand@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To believe that it's a universal truth that Republican are bad by default is just another way to become mystified by propaganda. I recommend not that thinking because it's nice to have robust solutions for the real problems we face and we each see something different. Just don't let your brain fall out...

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago

Any Republican that voted in favour of impeachment is fucking corrupt, as they already knew there was no evidence to support it.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 59 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

But if you tell yourself impeachments against "your guy" were completely political, that must be how it works right?

It must be so hard to live in that reality.

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's easier to live without thinking and without reason than you expect.

Even an idiot can do it. They just assume they're never wrong and yada yada yada narcissist's prayer, etc.

It's very easy for them to live in that reality when:

  • you have talking heads on Fox news and other media outlets shoving talking points down your throats.
  • social media platforms will push lies for pennies to millions of users instantly
  • political careers depend on bending the knee to the loudest, most extreme, fear mongering, wannabe dictator.

What's hard is to break free from that reality and find the truth after you've allowed yourselves to be brainwashed by the cult which is the current state of "American Conservatism."

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

They don't live in that reality. What you have to understand about conservatives is that they have an enlarged fear center in the brain and they value white supremacist hierarchy over any other thing, even truth.

They know for a fact that their guy did actual crimes and they just don't care. They understand that storing Top Secret documents next to the bathroom copier is worse than the unsecured email server they were screeching about in 2016.

If you consider a perspective where white supremacist hierarchy is more important than truth or integrity, all their behavior magically starts making sense.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I laughed so damn hard at this the bleach I was drinking shot right out my nose!

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Best way to keep that from happening again is to shove a UV lightbulb up your nose.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Wait, it goes up your nose? Well, this is awkward.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago

One of them goes up your nose. Don't get them mixed up though.

[–] RozhkiNozhki@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Please tell me you washed it before it went into your nose.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Wash it? Ridiculous. What exactly do you think the UV is for?

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah it would be doubly damning for them if they had the evidence but were unwilling to proceed

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 159 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They should be forced to carry their impeachment hearing to term; even if they don’t want to, even if they were fooled/forced into starting them, even if they know it’ll be dead on arrival.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] mikezane@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I thought it was a good joke. Not sure why people are down voting you.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Presumably because they already hinted at that joke, I just didn't think it was obvious enough. Others clearly disagreed

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I thought my hints were pretty obvious, without being overt. I didn’t downvote you, but I did consider replying with the ol’ “that’s the joke” meme.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Meh, if it's not a serious comment then down voted don't really matter. If it was, it'd be more disappointing because that tends to stifle conversation.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

the poster already made the roe joke. forced to carry it to term. then this genius chimed in: insert roe joke as if that wasn't just done here, and they didnt even bother to make a joke

dahnvoted!!

[–] mikezane@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Oh yeah. Apparently my reading comprehension has dropped. I missed the first joke.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 8 months ago

It seems like people don't want the results of that insertion and want it removed.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 100 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Now that their “star witness” has been outed as a paid liar, and that the money is coming from Trumpland? Yeah I’d start getting reaaaly quiet and hope everyone forgets the whole event too.

An American company that paid the now indicted FBI informant Alexander Smirnov in 2020 is connected to a UK company owned by Trump business associates in Dubai.

Smirnov is now accused of lying to the FBI about Hunter Biden and his father, President Joe Biden, alleging that they engaged in a bribery scheme served as a major justification of the House impeachment investigation into the Bidens.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This is the actual plot of Scooby-Doo. Here is my new art project. I'm going to start streaming reruns of the original Scooby-Doo and everytime a villian shows up I'm going to superimpose a GOP memebers picture on the villains head.

Every fucking time these cartoon plots are so stupid a dog could figure them out on accident.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Nonsense. They just need to find a star witness who is better at lying and scrub the paper trail a little better this time. Anything worth lying and cheating for is worth lying and cheating for again. It's not like there are any consequences.

/s obv

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 87 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nah, they can't abort this process at this point, they need to see it to full term.

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 52 points 8 months ago

I believe that a trial begins at conception.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 63 points 8 months ago (2 children)

“I don’t think we have the will to impeach Joe Biden,” Texas Representative Troy Nehls told Fox News on Tuesday. “We just don’t.”

Substitute the word evidence for will in the above statement, and you’ll have something much closer to the truth.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter. They beat the drums long enough for their followers to screech "What about Hunter Biden?!" Any time Democrats try to bring up impeachment for actual crimes. Mission successful.

Now it doesn't matter how it ends, as long as it ends quietly enough that faux news can not report on it.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Now it doesn't matter how it ends, as long as it ends quietly enough that faux news can not report on it.

And this is exactly why they’re trying to hit the Abort button now. A total lack of impeachment headlines is easy for republicans to hide behind a circus. If it never goes to a vote, then conservatives can’t be raked across the coals for failing. But “impeachment vote fails” is much much harder to hide, and the double-jeopardy rule could potentially prevent them from trying again in the future, (though that part is untested, since it hasn’t actually happened before. Some argue that they could still try again because double jeopardy only applies to criminal trials.)

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

These trumplicans are the worst. During the beghazi bs, they beat that drum for YEARS that it actually stuck in voters minds. Even though the only conclusion was that Republican budget cuts and refusing to give money to bolster security caused it. These morons couldn't give anything close to half truths or true sounding lies when asked follow up questions. Just kept hitting those talking points.

Ex. Greene asked about possible trump VP and a follow up question on conspiracy theories with MAGA. just went NO YOU and ran off.

[–] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry, they'll just find a way to blame Democrats for the entire shit show

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How dare Biden not inform them that he wasn't corrupt!

Every republican is a corrupt piece of shit by default so it's really on Biden for failing to following their norms.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

Every republican is a corrupt piece of shit by default so it's really on Biden for failing to following their norms.

That's probably why they started the whole thing. "Everyone is doing something they shouldn't, so if we start an investigation it doesn't matter if it's fake as we'll find something true to nail him on in the process."

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago

Republicans told me Biden is the CROOKEDEST President in HISTORY! And I FULLY SUPPORT them not Impeaching him anymore because that's what Republicans TOLD ME to support!

-Republicans who Think For Themselves.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Trump, who backs the impeachment effort, could then instruct the Justice Department to take up the charges.

I might be mistaken but I thought that Congress specifically made it so that the president CAN'T do this after the abuses of Nixon. Although the AG is a cabinet position, the DOJ is functionally separate from the president's overview.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

I am not seeing desperate here. I am seeing tired of an unsuccessful strategy

They absolutely have the will to impeach Biden. What they don't have is criminal acts supported by evidence to impeach him for... just a small detail.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Gosh, I thought they had all this Sooper Sekrit evidence or something!? Kinda like Orly Taitz had all that evidence on Obama?

Whatever happened?

In other news - at least Marge got the platform to share her personal spank bank with the world. I bet anything she has a special folder of Hunter Biden dong pics.

load more comments
view more: next ›