this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
756 points (99.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21282 readers
1411 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    756
    255.255.255.256 (lemmy.sdf.org)
    submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by lars@lemmy.sdf.org to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
     
    top 22 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 121 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    I wish someone would try that pickup line on me. All I get is "are you an IPv4 address? You look like you've been shared around between a few hundred households" :(

    [–] Asudox@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

    Face the reality.

    [–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 67 points 8 months ago

    That pickup line has a TTL of zero.

    [–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 40 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    192.168.1.0/24 = caffeine

    10.0.0.0/8 = cocaine

    [–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 31 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I use 10.69.4.20 as my gateway adress and you cant do anything about it

    [–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago
    iptables -A OUTPUT -s 10.69.4.20 -j DROP
    
    [–] somenonewho@feddit.de 13 points 8 months ago

    Oh I can be mad about it >:(

    Seriously gateways should be first or last address in the space. Fight me!

    [–] JustUseMint@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

    Lol an apt description

    [–] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
    [–] rtxn@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

    Brewing your coffee with red bull instead of water

    [–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 38 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    "32 bit is ought to be enough for everybody"

    -- ipv4 inventors probably

    [–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    "DNS never breaks. Nobody will ever have to type in an IP address"

    • ipv6 inventors probably
    [–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 14 points 8 months ago

    The never ending network problems keep sysadmins happily employed. AI can't replace them yet because they need internet connection to work.

    [–] palordrolap@kbin.social 19 points 8 months ago

    If I remember right, that is almost exactly what they thought. Or rather he. I think it was one guy. The one who wrote the RFC. And no-one called him on it because at the time, that did not seem unreasonable.

    4.3 billion devices that all need their own unique address? It's not like everyone on Earth will need one.

    What then followed was allocations of giant swaths of IPv4 addresses to large organisations, compounded by the fact that similarly large swaths were already reserved for special uses, leaving the whole thing with a problem basically from the outset.

    I believe that one guy has said that he wishes he'd made it 64 bit and even thought about it at the time. But the "save every byte" mindset of the pre-Internet era was still very much alive and well, and I think that's why he went for the smaller option.

    [–] fluxion@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    Is being exhausted a complement somehow?

    [–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 37 points 8 months ago

    No the joke is that this is that sassy but supporting friend saying it. It's a reality check and an opportunity to ask for help from the friend saying it.

    [–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    Isn't like only 80 some percent of IPv4s actually used?

    [–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 37 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    It's all allocated, but not all those allocations are for routing on the internet. Eg private ranges, localhost space, multicast, experimental ranges. Unfortunately you can't repurpose those ranges as there is already kit out there that is hard coded to treat them a particular way.

    [–] vox@sopuli.xyz 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    also why the fuck are there 16581375 addresses that just loopback to your own computer???
    reserving just 127.0.0.0/24 or even just 127.0.0.1 would've been more than enough, but nooo we're gonna ~~give you~~ waste a whole /8 block

    [–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 8 months ago

    why’s Apple have the entire 17 area code

    [–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 6 points 8 months ago

    Now that ipv4 address price reached $60 a pop, those represent a whopping $60 x 16777216 = $1,006,632,960.

    [–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago

    Because address classes. Stupid decision by stupid people.