168
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 48 points 7 months ago

D.C. has 670,000 people and only 2,000 Republicans voted in their primary. Weird how the people closest to government seem to not like Republicans.

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Most government employees don’t live in DC specifically. The government is also FULL of Republicans. However they’re “classical” Republicans for the most part. Also, a surprising number of those republicans think the government is inefficient and lazy, but they are also the laziest and most inefficient of all employees.

  • former government employee with Republican parents who worked all 30 years of their career in government.
[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So basically people like Stan on "American Dad". Bush/Reagan era Republicans.

[-] SlicingBot@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

The majority population in DC proper are people of colour. And the types of white Folx in the city are way more progressive than your average American.

Black or African American (non-hispanic) (43.9%) White (non-hispanic) (36.7%) Other (Hispanic) (4.23%) Asian (non-hispanic) (4.03%) White (Hispanic) (3.8%)

https://datausa.io/profile/geo/washington-dc/

Of the top five groups, whites only make up like 40%.

So this turn out is exactly right.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

d.c. has never, ever awarded its electoral votes to a republican candidate.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 46 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I root for her only because she’s pissing off Trump, which I enjoy.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 months ago

I agree, but also I think that it's dangerous. I don't think she has a chance in the primary, but if she does win I do think she has a chance in the general. Her policies are horrible, but it seems like none of that matters to anyone anymore. She's dangerous.

[-] TwentySeven@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Not as dangerous as Trump. I'll take a policy loss in return for a delivery win.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

I don't know. I think she has a better shot at the general than Trump. She has almost no chance in the primary because the republican party is poisoned by Trump, but she is more appealing to anyone else who hasn't stayed behind him. Most people are aware of how bad Trump would be, because we've already seen it. They aren't aware of how bad she'll be because they don't actually know anything about her.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I thought about voting for her in the Ohio primary this year just to try and get under Trump's skin, but that would lock in my voter registration until next year and I don't think I could stomach having an R next to my name and having my mailbox stuffed full of their propaganda for a year.
Then again, having an R next to my name might be a good survival strategy if Trump gets in office and legalizes liberal hunts or something of the sort.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Man, your guys system is so fucked.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

You should see our district maps!

[-] greybeard@lemmy.one 2 points 6 months ago

To clarify, when it cones time to voke, you can vote for whoever you want, but primaries are how the parties pick who they get behind. Generally it isn't allowed to vote in the primary for more than one party, or some people would vote in all primaries, helping put their candidate into multiple parties, or tanking a party by poisoning their ballot.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Haley took 63% of the GOP primary vote to 33% for Trump. Just over 2,000 D.C. Republicans cast ballots. Because Haley got more than half of the vote, she came away with the district's 19 delegates.

Washington’s moderate set of Republicans, many of whom work in politics or government, are seen as vastly different than those in other early states like South Carolina and Iowa, which set up a scenario where Haley had her first legitimate chance of notching a victory. Trump got just 14% of the vote in Washington’s 2016 primary.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Haley, who won the district primary over former President Donald Trump, has for weeks pledged to stay in the race through Super Tuesday, when 15 states and American Samoa will hold nominating contests.

“It could be anywhere between 2,000 and 6,000 voters,” district GOP chair Patrick Mara predicted in an interview with NBC News last week.

Mara said the campaigns for both Haley and Trump were sending text messages and doing phone calls to inspire turnout ahead of the primary, even having some volunteers go door-to-door.

The primary is run by the local Republican Party rather than the state, which is common in other nominating contests, with just one polling location at the Madison Hotel.

He said Trump’s dominance in early primary states and the perception that the Republican nominating process also impacted low turnout.

“The average Washington Republican is politically astute and more media-savvy, they have seen coverage telling people the race is over,” Mara said.


The original article contains 460 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
168 points (95.2% liked)

politics

18933 readers
4439 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS