this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
329 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
2524 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 68 points 1 year ago

This is really just pathetic on behalf of the Beijing author.

I still holdout hope that LK-99 may have some interesting properties.... But this? This is pathetic.

[–] rippersnapper@lemm.ee 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

China is doing a Speedrun in destroying their reputation. Began with COVID, then market confidence, now this (of course this isn't the first instance).

[–] motorheadkusanagi@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is one person, not all of China.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@kbin.social 93 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

How can we really know for sure? Maybe China is actually just one person moving really, really fast, wearing all sorts of different costumes.

That must be exhausting, no wonder they had trouble making a room temperature superconductor.

[–] Virkkunen@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The man, the legend, John China

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[–] Froyn@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it was Roger, he would have already renamed it to Bananarama.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I'm disappointed that it's not TBF

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The one person is representative for all billion Chinese people of course

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That man's name, Xi Jinping

[–] shaolin_shrimp@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So did the US with Trump and Britain with Brexit. There’s lying everywhere.

Hate to add to the polarisation and noise, but just wanted to highlight that we’re all at it.

:-[

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's almost like nation states are poor representations of the people who are forced to live under them.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Only if you're a poor or are otherwise considered unimportant.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, so the vast majority of people then.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Pretty much. yeah.

[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"It makes no sense for Chinese researchers to be deliberately faking the replication of some unrelated Korean scientists' supposed fraud (which makes no sense to be fraud in the first place). What could they possibly gain from it aside from the ruination of their own reputations as well?"

[–] codybrumfield@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

We should probably never underestimate some people’s addiction to clout.

[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Well, basically they get to say they synthesized it first, and the video is proof. While they may have understood it theoretically. So a big university could verify it publicly and then they could just lie and say “oh cool, see Stanford verified it as well, but I was/we were first”

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 22 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The original poster of one of the Billibilli videos circulating on the Internet and seemingly proving LK-99's levitation ability has come forward, and admitted his clip was a hoax.

The video in question is allegedly from the University of Science and Technology in Beijing and purports to show a small black substance floating in the air as it follows a magnet.

Whenever a claim as momentous and potentially civilization-changing such as "we've found the world's first room-temperature superconductor" is made, noise is bound to follow.

But even focusing on the hard science (which we want to be clear, replicable, and truthful) and moving on to the boundaries of peer-review scientific process, it becomes difficult to deal with the noise.

Neither the cooking time (how long at what temperatures the mixtures have to stay within a vacuum oven for LK-99 to be synthesized and whether there's thermal variation at any moment) nor the quench rate (the same, but when it needs to cool down) are, however, well-documented.

The video poster ultimately claimed that the experience of being a part of the noise had changed him, and that he'd be more cautious with his actions and words in the future.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] LegendofDragoon@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is it just the Beijing one that's bull hockey or is the whole material itself bologna?

[–] randomaccount43543@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s all bologna. Recent developments point to LK-99 being a ferromagnetic semiconductor, not a superconductor.

https://lemmy.world/post/2848960

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So far, definitively, just the Beijing video. No one's made that much of LK-99. So far, best I can tell, there's a few small flakes here and there that seem to have the correct atomic configuration. Whether that specific material is actually a superconductor is also, to my knowledge, up in the air. But, it is still a possibility.

From everything I've been reading, it's supposed to take longer to say for sure there's definitely not any room temperature superconductor here. Whereas, an easy positive outcome could have been shown much more quickly. There's supposed to still be a narrow path for a very specific atomic configuration to pass the tests, and until that has for sure been tested one way or the other, and the atomic configuration confirmed, it's undecided.

[–] LegendofDragoon@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Well here's hoping, it'll be a huge win for humanity if it works out and is, indeed replicable at any kind of scale. We haven't had very many winds as a species recently, so any victory would be great.

[–] Virkkunen@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Whether that specific material is actually a superconductor is also, to my knowledge, up in the air.

This fake attempt most certainly isn't up in the air

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The chances of "small flakes"being aligned in the order the original authors claim are needed to make the material super conductive, is 0. If the orientation of atoms is as important as it needs to be to have this revolutionary new super conducting method, you're going to have it a few atoms thick at a time, not small flakes. Especially when the fabrication details are as loosely detailed as they were.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Unknown, wait for more results, they'll have proper results in a few weeks.