this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
99 points (95.4% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sylveon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

How about actually tackling inequality instead of trying to hide it?

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

Education is, unironically, the best tool to combat inequality, but the effect only kicks in after the students have finished school.

In the meantime, uniforms cut down on bullying. What else do you want them to do? They don't have a magic wand, nor do they have magic money to hand out to struggling parents.

Edit: unironically some of the dumbest takes I've ever read on the internet in this thread.

[–] Redditquaza@feddit.de 32 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In the meantime, uniforms cut down on bullying.

Do they? I don't think so, people are just gonna get bullied with different "reasons", it's not really about the clothes after all.

[–] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 15 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I never saw someone got bullied for their clothes in my environment.

But kids got bullied for wearing glasses, let's hope they ban those then. Also, better to not let kids with weird accents in school. Wouldn't want to provoke the bullies.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So you got rid of one reason to bully, so bullies shifted to other stuff. How does this help now? Are there some studies, that prove school uniforms lead to quantitative less bullying? If yes, I would be interested in that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] onion@feddit.de 28 points 8 months ago (16 children)

uniforms cut down on bullying

[citation needed]

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] scrooge101@lemmy.ml 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is enough magic money to distribute if France (and every other country) would tax the rich.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's not even true. Children can differentiate between the cheap and expensive uniforms

[–] Rubanski@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Aren't they provided by the school? Or can you have a super high class tailor make you a uniform? I have no idea about school uniforms.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Maybe instead of throwing money for uniforms it could be used to hire teachers, repair the building, or buy furnitures? Just a couple of ideas you know...

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Do the whole pay for the uniforms? Here in Australia parents do, and it's ridiculously expensive.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There's no good option for it : either the parents pay for the uniform and it's a tax fir the poors, or the government pay for it and the money would be far better spent on teachers and stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You're missing the point. None of those things would help poor kids not appear poor and get bullied.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Uniform doesn't help for this either.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

makes the poor kids look the same

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Syndic@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What else do you want them to do?

How about working with troubled kids to address the underlying issues?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 5 points 8 months ago

Nah they like fancy clothes better, they know it will work. In the meantime, they will also cut 8000 jobs from education too.

[–] Unrelated@feddit.nl 41 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Apart from all the other points made here, I always wonder why uniforms have to look like there has been no development in clothing/fashion for the last 100+ years? Why do they have to look like they are extras on a Harry Potter filmset?

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 months ago

Some schools have uniforms that are just khakis and a polo, but yeah I dunno why a lot of places think blazers and ties are a good idea. I had to wear those in HS and never got used to it-- still hate ties to this day

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 36 points 8 months ago (3 children)

If the uniforms are provided, with needed accessories to be worn correctly, then sure.

If it's just an "affordable" vendor, then meh.

Fines only work on the poor, and a not-free but mandatory uniform simply acts like a fine for being poor.

[–] Ziggurat@fedia.io 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bases on the news, a basic kit is provided. What worries me is the only 2 polo shirts part. (but a blazer jacket because they have their priorities right). I can't see how family will keep them clean without buying extra ones. Not a problem for kids from middle class and above family who have access to a dryer and an afford a couple of "same colour polo shirt" which "should do the trick as part of an uniform assuming the principal isn't a asshole). But if you're from a poor family, where clothes need 3 days to dry on a rack. They'll be the stinky dirty kid

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.de 14 points 8 months ago

In most climates, clothes will dry in 1 day. Still – 3 is the absolute minimum: 1 to wear, 1 to wash, 1 to dry.

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Oh look, the far right pretending they care about children again... Let's see... I'm gonna bet on some minister has some shares in a clothes factory somewhere

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 8 months ago

Not just provided, but also provided in sufficient amounts. And ideally with a comprehensive replacement policy. If you give just one then there will be problems when it needs cleaning or if it gets damaged.

[–] Devi@kbin.social 17 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I was on board until I heard it was the far right, those guys and uniforms have a bad history.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

Allow us to tackle inequality by forcing poor families to buy expensive uniforms from our selected supplier.

Please ignore all our financial links with said supplier.

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Kids are smarter than we give them credit for. Kids know.

[–] taladar@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago

Especially today or are they going to provide uniform phones, social media pictures,... too?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (6 children)

I hated wearing uniforms in school, but as an adult idk it wasn’t that bad so long as they’re unisex and modern. I still hate wearing business casual but I did never get picked on for dressing poorly

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But uniforms have made a return to one town as part of a government pilot scheme to establish if they can reduce inequality – and improve behaviour.

In the Brittany village of Plouisy, the mayor from Emmanuel Macron’s Renaissance party signed up for the experiment but pulled out after complaints from angry parents.

Uniforms were first introduced in secondary schools in France by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1802, who wanted to instil more military-style discipline in the education system, and were modelled on army outfits.

They have not been compulsory in state schools in mainland France since 1968, seen as a watershed moment in French society because of the civil unrest that dominated the spring.

In 2016 the rightwing presidential candidate François Fillon and the far-right leader Marine Le Pen included the imposition of school uniforms in their election manifesto.

Parents are divided about the utility of introducing uniforms: some have suggested it will lead to more apparent equality while others have pointed out that inequalities can be still expressed in such items as shoes, scarves, mobile phones and backpacks.


The original article contains 636 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Matombo@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago

This is just dump as people will flex woth different things: Smartphones, Watches, Jewlery, the Car their Parrents pick them up in, their School Bag Brand ...

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί