this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
406 points (100.0% liked)

Memes @ Reddthat

1004 readers
3 users here now

The Memes community. Where Memes matter the most.

We abide by Reddthat's Instance Rules & the Lemmy Code of Conduct. By interacting here you agree to these terms.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 36 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Someone stepped on the poor thing.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 8 months ago

PTSD from smashed matchbox cars just kicked in.

[–] Onii-Chan@kbin.social 27 points 8 months ago

How to make an otherwise great-looking car ugly.

[–] Aku@lemm.ee 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Meh I say to each their own. Would I do it to my car? Nope. But I have no hate for other people doing it.

[–] otacon239@feddit.de 32 points 8 months ago (4 children)

The problem is that these are incredibly unsafe. You’re putting about 5% of the part of the tire meant to keep the car in control on the pavement. I don’t want to be on the road with these morons because if they hit a pothole, who knows what direction they’re going to ping off.

As far as style, I’m with you, but these are massive safety compromises.

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'd have to imagine it would wear down the tires incredibly quickly too. I'm not much of a car enthusiast but I've never understood this one when I've spotted it in the wild. It seems incredibly impractical.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It's an exaggerated version of something that's used in racing, but going this far is not useful.

When you go around a corner, the car will lean into a bit. If the tires are angled like this (known as "toe"), more of the rubber is in contact with the road through the corner. Of course, this comes at the expense of having less rubber touching in the straights. Racing teams will tweak it a few degrees depending on how bendy the course layout is.

But only a few degrees. Toe to this extent doesn't do anything but wear down a little strip of tire.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

For more information, it's more broadly called camber angle.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago

Hey thanks for the excellent explanation. I always wondered what the point was and you summarized it perfectly so that even an idiot like me can understand.

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Someone once told me that when the car is going 100mph+ the tires stretch out and touch the road, providing full coverage. They could not answer how the tires maintained pressure while stretching that much nor how that provided any benefit that wouldn't have been there with the tires on the ground to begin with.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I mean this is true with dragsters but not most cars.

Look up a video of a dragster warming his tires. Those things balloon like crazy.

[–] Aku@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Interesting I didn’t not think of this from a safety perspective. Good point. If it’s truly dangerous for people then yeah I’m with you.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I mean I don't exactly see stance cars out on the highway often, but maybe thats my area and when I'm awake. I think they're usually more of a project you take to car shows/meets or whatever cause they're lowered so far they scrape all the time in regular driving and the suspension can't work without a meaningful amount of travel. Though it could be bagged (riding on air suspension that can rise and lower).

I think they look silly and they're definitely not practical, but I don't know that stance cars actually end up being a safety hazard, so I'm not inclined be judgey other than to say I don't personally like them. I could be wrong about the level of risk they pose people day to day though- in which case my stance would change.

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

It's an art form, these things aren't out driving usually, they're displayed at shows and then put in a garage until the next show

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

even worse are modern american cars, they look like they have breathing issues and are so hideously oversized that people are literally backing over their kids on their own driveways

[–] wopazoo@hexbear.net 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Frontovers, not backing over. The hoods are so tall that they straight up run over their own kids in their own driveways, killing them, driving forwards.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Whay do you mean, that car is pretty co... WHY THE WHEELS?!

[–] don@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

Well what else were they gonna modify, the engine? The body? The head and tail lights?

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 15 points 8 months ago

I once saw these cartoon drawings of tuned cars in a shop somewhere.

I thought they looked neat, but that was back when I didn't know people actually angled their wheels like that. I thought it was just stylised like that for effect.

Man it looks stupid in real life.

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago

I disagree. This is stupid and fun.

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 6 points 8 months ago

Honestly, that car looks like it finna collapse...

If there's a style you shouldn't respect, despite it being perfectly fine to drive, it's one of those big-ass SUV trucks some people use...

That's the type of car you use to run over people willingly, or accidentally, with its tall bumper height, and the type you should use MOSTLY in war...

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Mario Kart hover mode

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Stupid yes, but I'll support it. I'll support anything car related

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bold statement, is "hit and run" included in this anything?

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Who gets hit?

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (4 children)

So are all your LED shit computers. Stop being judgey.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

I'm talking shit behind a parking lot speed bump. You are powerless to stop me.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I can't drive like a fuckin moron through houston in my led computer

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I should hope not. Good thing you can in one of these.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My pc is a regular dark box and my girlfriends is a neon rave show. It's kinda funny if you come over and see them, interesting juxtaposition.

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't actually have that big an issue with the LED, in just pointing out the judgey shit 😑

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Heaven forbid people have opinions 🙄

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Did you even read this thread once? Jesus Christ 🤦‍♂️

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

when was the last time anyone saw those LED computers? LED computers in no way affect others, cars like this do.

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Oh because these cars wrecking people left and right, correct? A menace!? And I bet you have data to back that up.

These cars aren't hurting anyone. How does this cat affect you in any way?

[–] SoloboiNanook@hexbear.net 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Car enthusiast here and hard disagree. I respect anyone willing to pursue aesthetic so hard even at the cost of practicality. I enjoy cars slammed so low that the rim is bending the fender out etc.

At a certain point the car is sacrificed in the pursuit of some aesthetic point and I find that very amusing, and quite like it, even if it is practically "dumb". It's far stupider to get weird as hell about some very niche slice of car enthusiasts who bother doing this to this extreme.

[–] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Sure. Everybody is allowed to like what they like. And I have zero issues with seeing these cars at a car show. But the moment these fuckwits try driving these cars on a public road they deserve ALL the hate they get. They are prone to mechanical failure and are often unable to navigate common road conditions safely. One day I was on a road trip and there must have been a car show somewhere along the highway because every few minutes along the highway I'd see a group of cars with this mod along the side of the road with one of their number in obvious distress, with a wheel falling off or some other thing.

[–] BlueMagaChud@hexbear.net 3 points 8 months ago

if it's fwd and/or an suv go ahead and have fun with that, I couldn't think less of them anyway

[–] terry_tibbs@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I vaguely remember learning about excessive camber being good for doing sick drifts and stuff, fucked if you hit a speedbump though.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Camber for drifting is to provide more or less grip or control. Especially on the front tires that lose contact surface when they are turned 80 degrees. Drift cars usually don't have much camber on the rear, the front is usually under 10 degrees with the top of the tire tilted inward.

Camber in the case of the OP has nothing to do with performance or practicality. It is done to be extreme, either in the case of camber for camber sake or to allow the car to ride as low as possible with the largest wheels/tires possible. The OP example is almost certainly camber for camber sake due to how extreme it is.