this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
166 points (98.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6623 readers
501 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 80 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Mandolingual@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Prigozhin_irl

[–] einfach_orangensaft@feddit.de 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Just new connection to metro 2 da

[–] waigl@lemmy.world 54 points 9 months ago (2 children)

In all seriousness, digging tunnels is a military tactic that gets some use sometimes. The Russians have done it in the southern part of Avdiivka. I haven't heard of a case where militaries used an actual tunnel boring machine, though.

Tunnel boring machines are not just extremely expensive, they're also extremely bulky and highly visible when on top of the ground. If you ship one to where you want to start your tunnel, there is a high risk that enemy intel will spot it, ruining the surprise.

The actual digging is extremely slow, meaning there is no way of knowing whether the tunnel will even still have some tactical use when you're done.

Once you emerge on the other side, it won't be long until the enemy notices your exit and does something about it, like bombarding it, stationing troops there or sending something of their own back through the tunnel. That means even if you succeed, you only have a very short window to do something with your tactical advantage, and said something will very likely be a suicide mission.

Tunneling through the loose mud of Ukraine would not be easy. You can do it if you send a work crew after the machine to immediately build strong walls behind it, but that would be even slower and more expensive.

All in all, it would just be more useful to use either much smaller and shorter tunnels that don't use tunnel boring machines or utilize some form of artillery or drones to achieve the desired effect behind enemy lines.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Adding that tunnel boring is really noisy. Russian seismic activity sensors should pick it up and locate long before they get even close

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You can mask the noise with nuclear strikes.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 9 months ago

Ah why didn't I think of that

[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 months ago

Too credible

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 46 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A superlative suggestion, sir, with just two minor flaws. One, we don't have any tunnel boring machines, and two, we don't have any tunnel boring machines. Now I realise that, technically speaking, that's only one flaw but I thought it was such a big one it was worth mentioning twice.

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

Interesting, I started reading it in his voice before I was even sure that's what you were doing.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago
[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 months ago

Y'all questioned it at the time, but this is precisely why we signed a mutual defense treaty with the molemen.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It wouldn't work because it's a boring strategy.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe if we drill a bit deeper we can make it fun.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 1 points 9 months ago

I heard they like bigger drill, not longer

[–] swearengen@sopuli.xyz 8 points 9 months ago

I bet it could be done if it was purpose built and not a big old slow one that was designed for huge car and train traffic sized tunnels.

Make it smaller for man sized tunnels, it will be much faster and cheaper. Basically drone-ified. Could really catch the Russians off guard.

It would also help reduce the chances of it being detected above ground while it's being moved to the starting point and bleow ground when it's digging.

Russian air defense struggles as it is I doubt they'd be fully prepared to monitor for tunnel activity.

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 months ago

Battle of five armies in Ukraine when?

[–] devilish666@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Because it's cheaper to nuke Russia than use many boring machine

[–] Kjev@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago

The war would be over by the time they make it... assuming the other side never catches wind about it.

[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's definitely possible, I remember there was a documentary about it

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago