this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
907 points (98.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55076 readers
441 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 19 points 10 months ago

Netflix should've realised this would be the end result. The moment you needed 5-6 different streaming platforms to watch all the movies and tv shows you want, was the moment it became easier and significantly cheaper to pirate the content.

None of the big companies that decided to cash in ever stood a chance.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 17 points 10 months ago

Cable TV 2.0: "Boohoo, pirates are eating my profits!"

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The thing is that we need an class action Anti-Competitive lawsuit that says that streaming providers are not allowed to only host shows on their own platform and need to "sell themselves" their shows at the same price as they sell to others in pay-per-view terms. That way all streaming providers can host all shows and everyone gets theirs.

It'll also bring out other streaming services that specialise in low-volume purchases with an a-la-carte payment model.

All shows on every platform should be the standard and subscriptions should focus on packaging it into "100/200/1000" views per month, SD/HD/4K model just like Internet service providers do.

Rip not going to see that before I die so that's the pirates life for me. 🦜🏴‍☠️

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I wouldn't mind paying for netflix if I didn't have to pay extra to not get ads, and if I didn't have to use a "smart" tv to actually get uhd, and if I trusted them with the data that they would get from that tv, and if I could share my account with my family in different cities, and if they had shows I actually wanted to watch and probably some other stuff too, but i stopped caring.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

I find that sarcastically interesting.

I initially signed up for Netflix all those many years ago because it was finally a solution that was easier than piracy.

Didn't take long for them to completely fuck me and the service over, and I left to go back to piracy and I'll never look at Netflix again.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago

It really isn't because Netflix did it easily in the 2010s. But then, as always, capitalism got in the way and we are back to the cable era where even if you pay, you still have ads.

[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Wow! It's almost as if greed and hubris caused all the media companies to split everything up so they wouldn't have to share with netflix and now no one can keep track of which services are hosting what shows in which countries.

So learning how to pirate things and paying for a VPN that won't snitch is easier than paying for a dozen different streaming services in addition to your internet connection.

MULLVAD! ProtonVPN! QBITTORRENT! POPCORN-TIME! KASPERSKY!

Sorry...I have Tourette's syndrome. FUCKING QUANTUM RESISTANT ENCRYPTION WITH MULLVAD! PORT FORWARDING OFF WITH PROTON! Sorry...I meant to say that piracy is immoral and wrong! How are billionaires supposed to afford their diamond studded, solid gold toilets or their giant mansions on huge plots of land if we pirate things?!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

..If you are expecting wild profits, year after year, ever increasing. Turns out that's unsustainable.

[–] AbsurdityAccelerator@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Make Netflix more convenient than my ARR setup and I'll happily come back.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

When Netflix was under $10 I stopped pirating and just watched stuff on Netflix because it was worth it for the convenience at the price point.

That is how they solve piracy. Everything they have been doing over the last couple of years is the reason for the increase in piracy.

[–] VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Piracy isn't stealing if buying isn't owning.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Netflix: “Should I get short term profits by price gouging and forcing commercials on people (thereby driving people to piracy) or should I forgo year over year profit increases by continuing to provide decent tv with no commercials and no price increases and delivering consistent profits?”

Also Netflix:

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›