this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
325 points (93.1% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3319 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 152 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Yeah, because it couldn't possibly be that Americans are opposed to genocide.

For fuck's sake, Pelosi. Witch hunts are supposed to be a Republican thing.

[–] Baines@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago (5 children)

wouldn’t be the first time Russia has done something like this, that said, how about we stop supporting genocide and it won’t matter

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Wouldn't be the first time democrats have done this, either.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (9 children)

While it's all certainly Americans, and we don't like genocides, she is correct in assuming that Putin wants Trump to win, and this would be an effective way to further that goal.

Don't forget Putin was KGB.

I imagine it's more through social media manipulation and misinformation than FSB funding, I suppose I could be wrong. By way of example, though, how many times have you heard that white phosphorous is banned, even though that's not exactly true?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 146 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Imagine how out-of-touch you have to be to represent San Francisco and not realize sincere antiwar protesters exist.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 43 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Here is my completely nonpartisan hot take. We should pass a constitutional amendment that ties the maximum age to hold public office (including judges) to the Social Security "Normal Retirement Age" at the time of passing. That is currently 67 years old. You can do whatever you want past 67, but you can't hold public office.

[–] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do you want them to make the retirements age 90? I’d rather not give those assholes a perverse incentive to reduce benefits.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 73 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but lets also investigate the House for financial ties to billionaires.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 25 points 9 months ago

...and Russia, probably.

And investigate both sides - Russia will support both extremes in any issue that causes unrest in Western democracies. So investigating only one side is a useful propaganda tool but kind of misses the mark.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Muyal@lemmy.world 59 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Vietnam war all over

"Foreign agents are brainwashing our youth to be against the war"

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 54 points 9 months ago (12 children)

"Hey guys, we need a surefire way to make our base stay home instead of vote when we have a literal fascist running who will end the Republic if he's allowed to win!"

Nancy: "Say no more fam, I got this."

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago

Man, these fuckers really fucking hate their base.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 40 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 43 points 9 months ago (1 children)

She’s been woefully out of touch on a lot of things for at least a decade at this point

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We've gotten to the point that America is like one of those sci-fi dystopia movies where the council of elders rules the nation, kept alive artificially while the people starve.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago (3 children)

You guys are getting paid!?

[–] ButtermilkBiscuit@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Turns out you don't need to get paid to support Palestinians, you just need to not be a huge piece of shit!

Wild I know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Anything to not have to stop a genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wish I was getting paid to support Palestine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago (4 children)

What an utter bitch. Your finances are the ones that should be investigated.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 30 points 9 months ago

This cunt needs to go the fuck away.

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Shouldn't we instead be investigating the politicians currently in office that we have a really good reason to believe have a monetary tie to Russia and have a mountain of evidence of being coerced or controlled by them due to said politicians' past actions (going to a secret meeting to Moscow on July 4th, ect)?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 28 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Dividing the party sounds like a Russian ploy. Can we investigate her first?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Let's concede that the people organizing protests are receiving money from Russia. Is that actually a criminal matter? Apparently Trump's campaign working with Russia wasn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Pelosi is just saying that opposition to genocide means you must be Russian, which is what I keep hearing from pro-genocide centrist Democrats on lemmy.

I don't get why those same centrists are turning on her.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 9 months ago

"Eat the 1%" isn't a strong enough punishment for this kind of statement

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Those stupid fucks really want to lose the election

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 9 months ago

Nearly every Republican will vote for Trump. Meanwhile, the Democrats are notoriously fickle already, and have to convince enough independents to vote for them, and they're doing everything in their power to alienate people in both camps.

Typical establishment hubris. The other side supports fascism, so we dare you not to vote for us, or just the assumption that enough people support them out of the gate to win (like Hillary Clinton). And we are fucked by the two party system again.

[–] Jomega@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not that I think she has ties to Russia, but really the FBI needs to be investigating members of Congress for ties to Russia.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

If the cons want to understand (ah, who am I kidding, they don't want to understand anything) why many of us in the reality-based community chuckle about the idea of Pelosi even being half the liberal they seem to think she is...they might take a closer look here.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 14 points 9 months ago

Can they also investigate her insider trading?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Shouldn't we also investigate pro-Israel defenders for Financial Ties to Defense Contractors?

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I need someone to ely5 how to get to this conclusion.

"For them to call for a ceasefire is Mr. Putin's message. Make no mistake. This is directly connected to what he would like to see”

How? What does he gain from it?

I bet he loves how she just added fuel to more devision.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

“Disinformation” has become to the left, what “fake news” is to the right - a cudgel to deflect dissent or crush differing options as false or astroturfed, and therefore not even worth discussion to dismiss

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's cute that you think Pelosi is "left-wing". Cute, but sad.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago

She’s not (by global nor US standards) but she did run the ‘left wing’ party in Congress for 20 years. So they certainly think she is.

[–] Thormjolnir@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (9 children)

As a liberal, peolsi is sham lol anyone not pro Palestine is just evil

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Foni@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So this November Americans will be able to choose between literally a Nazi and someone who strongly supports genocide and treats anyone who doesn't support it as a traitor.

Good luck with that

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›