this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
231 points (97.5% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 86 points 10 months ago (4 children)

20/80 out of any population are absolute numbskulls

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 37 points 10 months ago

Imagine how dumb the average person is, then remember that half the world is dumber than that.

George Carlin

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

50% of humanity is below average Intelligence

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 32 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] fatzgebum@feddit.de 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Intelligence is often modelled as a bell curve, where median and average (arithmetic mean) are equal.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago
[–] pyr0ball@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

W̵̛̬̜͇͕̊͛̑̓̎Ȩ̸̜̱̰̭̠̞͗̆͑́̈́͑̕I̴̮͚͎̲͇͈̯͐̋̕Ģ̷̭̆̑̿̾̀̅̓ͅḨ̴̧̹̩̮̼̟̆̃͆̈́̃T̴̡͔͙̰̣̈́̃́̌̄͗ͅE̴̠̻͇̐͑͂D̵̺̜̠̼̋̊́̈̀̕ ̴̨͎̩̙̤̦͂͐̋̕͠ͅM̷̞̣̺̼̕͜E̴̖̳̯̬̣̍͐̋͐A̶͈̿͌͊̄͋Ņ̷̝̭́͑̂̎̂̕͜

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

median is a type of average, just like arithmetic or geometric mean

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago

'bout 1 significant digit, I'd say

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think that's being generous

[–] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There are others that are somewhat numbskulls, then some that are sorta numbskull-ish.

I’ve been all these during my lifetime for sure. Just striving to be ‘Less Numbskull’ is a lifelong pursuit.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah life’s quite a work in progress

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Fourthteenth percent of people know that!!

[–] ShroOmeric@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Being teenagers they'll have plenty of time to see who's right. Good luck.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

They’ll only have a decade or so on me so for my sake I hope they’re magically right.

[–] SitD@feddit.de 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

i think it's worth mentioning that a human will gain familiarity with the environment that they grow up in.

we foster an environment where the environment burns down, and the people earning a lot of money (suggesting responsibility) are wimpy losers who cannot solve this problem. let decades pass, and the new generation considers it unsolvable.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Or, worse, they consider the changed world normal because they never personally knew anything better. This is the "shifting baseline" theory and it is an absolutely terrifying thought.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 5 points 10 months ago

the people earning a lot of money (suggesting responsibility) are wimpy losers who cannot solve this problem.

That's not the problem, but I really wish it was. The problem is that the people who are actually in charge are psychopaths who don't give a shit about doing anything to the problem, and are more motivated to actually make things worse

[–] dimath@ttrpg.network 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What do the other two thirds think?

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml 50 points 10 months ago (1 children)

the world is on fire and we should probs do something about that

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 13 points 10 months ago

Can we please talk first about whether we want to discuss the existence of this so called climate change? After we have decided whether we want to talk about it, we should talk about what we acknowledge as part of it and what not. Of course only if we decide that we do want to talk about talking about it first. If people are unhappy with this procedure i wantto first bring it to debate though.

[–] iegod@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

From the country that brought you brexit.

[–] WbrJr@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

In the new series. "We act. Than think. Maybe." By badfoodproductions. (Imagine it read by Morgan Freeman)

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Does that mean that ⅔ believe Climate change is not exaggerated? Or are there more options?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Researchers from the CCDH gathered a dataset of text transcripts from 12,058 climate-related YouTube videos posted by 96 channels over almost six years from 1 January 2018 to 30 September 2023.

They also included the results of a nationally representative survey conducted by polling company Survation which found 31% of UK respondents aged 13 to 17 agreed with the statement “Climate change and its effects are being purposefully overexaggerated”.

This mentality has seeped into UK politics, with rightwing politicians having campaigned for years to persuade the public that net zero is unachievable and too expensive, and that technologies including electric cars and heat pumps do not work.

They should refuse to amplify or monetise cynical climate denial content that undermines faith in our collective capacity to solve humanity’s most pressing challenge.”

The New Climate Denial report shows a disturbing shift in the tactics used by bad actors to derail the action needed to avert further disaster.

All social media companies must stop amplifying and profiting off the climate denial that threatens action on the most pressing crisis of human history.”


The original article contains 814 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

The 5 minute baths and McDonald's paper spoons will solve the issue.

[–] letmesleep@feddit.de -1 points 10 months ago

To me that's good news. "Exaggerated" is a long way from denial and it's not unlikely that a lot of the teens in question thought of actual exaggerations when they answered. The extinction claims exist and they are vastly exaggerated. Climate change may kill more people than both world wars combined, but it's not going to get us anywhere near extinction. Even a nuclear war triggered by climate change wouldn't be able to move us from the "least concern" part of the endangered species list. The resulting famine might kill most humans, but you'd need a thousand times more nuclear warheads than in current inventories to wipe out everyone on the surface. And even then people in bunkers would survive.