this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
0 points (50.0% liked)

Programming

17424 readers
23 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lysdexic@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago

I found that it was worth sharing this list of IP protocols because more often than not developers are only faced with two of them, TCP and UDP, but there are over a hundred of IP protocols, most of which are never discussed or see the light of day. One I find particularly interesting is UDP-lite.

[–] bizdelnick@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you going to post links to all Wikipedia articles here?

[–] lysdexic@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Are you going to post links to all Wikipedia articles here?

What problem do you have with Wikipedia?

[–] bizdelnick@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No problems with Wikpedia, I always can go there and find what I need. There's a problem with flood of meaningless link-only posts here.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'd argue this is interesting. I mean, not all Wikipedia pages could be considered interesting by many, but OP clearly wanted to start a discussion about it, saying that we know TCP and UDP already, but there are many more.

You can go anywhere and everywhere, but if something is on Wikipedia it doesn't mean that it's uninteresting.

[–] bizdelnick@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

If this is so interesting, where's the discussion you are talking about? And I did not say there's nothing interesting in Wikipedia. It is easy to find for everyone who needs it.

[–] computergeek125@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I really only clicked on this to see if there were one you found interesting. Plenty of old interesting protocols and lots that probably can't survive in a NAT/PAT environment like we have today, reducing us to a handful of IP protocol numbers that we actually use day to day. If you exclude routing equipment, that number is even less.

There's just no prompt here. I for one love rabbit holes but where to even start here?

[–] SludgeGunkman@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I could spend hours on this shit