this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
130 points (95.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9628 readers
685 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skydivekingair@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

First, fuck cars.

Second, why wouldn’t a traffic circle about the same size work? I’ve seen massive ones overseas that do a damn good job at moderating traffic for heavy flow intersections like this one.

Third, I only watched about a minute in to the video, so maybe he says something about circles later.

[–] Magiccupcake@startrek.website 20 points 10 months ago

He talks about the intersection a lot, but the main problem with this intersection has nothing to do with the intersection itself. It's the surrounding area that backs up into and causes it to fail.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

No chance it would be chaos. Too many lanes to change.

Even if you did something like that you would have traffic going straight through the roundabout on the main street and traffic going around for everything else.

But with that many lanes it wouldn't be designed like that I dont think. Would be branched off before it.

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

You could have 50000000000000 lanes and it would make zero difference because at the end of the people all still want one exit to one section of town that backs up the whole thing

[–] Mannivu@feddit.it 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As an European I've never seen a diverging diamond (though I've been in the US a few times) and boy they look scary to drive across. I know you just have to drive straight, but that criss-cross interchange looks scary.

Also: how big is that parking lot? It reminds me of those Simpson's gags were the family have to park so far away they can't even see the location they came to visit.

[–] MetaCubed@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

We got our first one here a little while ago and personally, while they might look terrifying, it's actually the smoothest experience I have ever had with an interchange

That being said, they are hell for pedestrians