Sad to see such article written as if it was all firefox's fault, instead of google and apple's anticompetitive (and probably illegal) strategies playing a great role.
this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
-59 points (21.4% liked)
Firefox
17898 readers
56 users here now
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
PRESENTED BY GOOGLE CHROME
π
Edit; I'm happy with Firefox, and have been using it exclusively for about 6 years now.
Fuck Google. Do no harm, unless it generates profit.
Right? I've been on Firefox since forever because it's a "no bullshit" browser that just does what I need. It's not running like a thousand instances of itself in the background even after I close it the way Chrome does.
bit of a hit piece, citing lots of old data. my n=1 study indicates a 100% satisfaction rate with firefox and I have personally turned on at least 30 former chrome users to Firefox within the last 2 months. so... Β―\_(γ)_/Β―
This is just zdnet being zdnet Firefox remains the best browser for me and many others. The percentage of users in highly educated groups is much higher and there is a reason for this.
Firefox could murder my sister and as long as they supported mobile ad blocking I'd still say they're the best browser.
Well that was a well paid hit piece. For the record, I am happy with Firefox and its functions, I've been using it since the start.
I am rather worried about Mozilla's new laser focus on AI and the Corp CEO compensation bonuses are just bullshit.
I'm hoping we won't be forced into a completely Google dominated web because I thinking at that point it's time to abandon it and burn everything to the ground
Firefox is the shit, I am extremely happy with it. Even just for stupid monkey brain pretty the themes are better. Its all just better. I feel terrible for ever using chrome.
I have been using Firefox for over a decade and am still more than happy with it.
Firefox lovers will never admit it. I just use it because it's the only real, opensource alternative, but I sure am not happy with it nor Mozilla.
Yeah, totally the same. I'm only using it because that's the only option, I'll never use a chromium based browser, because that engine directly contradicts my my values. But the CEOs pay very much bothers me too, she does not deserve it at all, that money should be spent on useful work on the browser.
I have been thinking it for long that it's not a good browser, but the one that is the minimally bad. Of course I don't tell this to people when I try to get them to switch, because for them it does not send the message I actually wanted.
I've been trying not to go to Chromium, but honestly, Mozilla is giving me less and less reason to. The only thing holding me back is Chromium's terrible customisability. They don't have containers and their sidebar is really new, so TreeStyleTabs won't work yet. Also it doesn't have last recently used tab switching and it's not possible to remove the horizontal tab bar to only have a sidebar with TreeStyleTabs π
Oh, there's more than that. A lot more. Just one example: ublock and such firewalls weren't effective for long, because on browser startup it does not hold back network requests while the filter lists of addons haven't loaded yet. But as you probably know, in recent years google has been working hard to reduce filtering capabilities of addons to the ground.
To me there's still a lot of reasons to keep Firefox, but actually instead these are just reasons to never install chrome, and never support it for friends (because it can't be supported, because it does not even try to serve the user's interest, because it is not a useragent, as it is technically called, but a corporate agent)
Garbage article from a garbage outlet. Firefox is doing just fine for anyone who is using it. Itβs not going anywhere anytime soon and these articles are written just to get a rise out of people.
Mozilla isnβt perfect, and has loads of room for improvement, but at least theyβre trying to provide alternatives to the nonsense of MS and Google. Iβd love a new browser that disrupts the stagnation we have these days, but if theyβre only going to be built on top of existing things like Chromium, with its bullshit Manifest v3, then no thanks, Iβll stick with Firefox.
The statistic of low Firefox use is based on accessing US government websites. Could it be that there is significantly LESS government site access by the population of users that prefer Firefox? As a corollary I recently read that game companies observed significantly HIGHER bug reporting from Linux users on Steam, not because there were more Linux-related bugs, but simply because that set of users were more likely to initiate bug reports. Of course Firefox is not Linux and Steam is not the world, but a statistic from a relatively narrow segment of the internet should not be assumed representative of the whole.
Statcounter is a web analytics service. Our tracking code is installed on more than 1.5 million sites globally.
They list Firefox with 7.61% on desktops
I bet many Firefox Users block those trackers.
I've been a believer since Netscape 3 and am a happy user on my desktops, phone, and tablets. I struggle to imagine a world without extensions on mobile. Firefox is also my password manager of choice, offering way more usability than any of the other options with at least the same level of security (AES-256 and 10,000 rounds of PBKDF2). I hope to never have to consider a move and don't foresee ZDNet's predicted death. 2.2% still apparently equates to almost $600M of revenue. That'll keep the train running for quite a while. Still, I wish Mozilla listened better. Getting rid of XUL extensions was a self-inflected gunshot wound and not getting the full extension list to mobile for 2 years was just asking people to leave.
This is why I use waterfox
I remember ditching Google Chrome in favor of Firefox.