this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
-28 points (26.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

29698 readers
1214 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We like boom boom, no?

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The risk of a failed launch and having a nuclear warhead falling on an unintended target isn't negligible, and sending a heavy payload outside of the Earth gravitational pull is quite expensive.

Same reason why we don't send our nuclear waste into space or the sun.

And damaging another planet in our solar system use of little scientific value compared to leaving it as-is.

[–] CaptainMcMonkey@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We thought about it, but then we signed a treaty or two that cancelled the project.

[–] CaptainMcMonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Personal opinion though: It would be an absurdly expensive way to taint future study of any place we nuke, especially if we want any hope to find any type of life on another planet.

I really hope we find something on Europa or Titan. Both have water and heat, so maybe they’ve got something next to a seafloor vent or something.

[–] Mamertine@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

2 flaws I see.

All countries have a gentleman agreement not to launch nuclear material into space. If the launch failed, it'd be catrostrophic for people here in earth.

It's really expensive to launch stuff into space, getting stuff out of the earths orbit is another level of power beyond getting it above the atmosphere.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

They use radioactive materials on long range stuff

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago
[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You would be a contender in either American political party with a platform as robust as that one. @ViscloReader@lemmy.world 2024!

[–] ogginger43@infosec.pub 4 points 10 months ago

I'd really hope my tax money doesn't go to something like this. But I'm sure it's paid for dumber things.

[–] the_beber@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Are you by any chance a writer at Kurzgesagt?

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Because we wouldn't be able to see it from that far away. I say we do what you said but for the far away land of Britain and that way we can all enjoy it here on earth ☺️