I’m surprised the Starlink satellites don’t have cameras and sell realtime imaging as a product. It seems like a natural way for SpaceX to increase revenue and become indispensable to governments around the world. Or maybe they do and we just don’t know about it.
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
18 points (78.1% liked)
SpaceX
1931 readers
61 users here now
A community for discussing SpaceX.
Related space communities:
- !spaceflight@sh.itjust.works
- !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !space@lemmy.world
Memes:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I can only speculate on reasons. Cameras would add mass and energy consumption, and they're already launching a lot fewer satellites per launch as it is. I suspect that good imaging requires a lot of specialist knowledge and experience, like how to build lenses and sensors, and what frequencies of light to look at (visible? infrared? radar?), and how to do destriping and other image cleanup. There are already other companies with satellites in low orbits with frequent imaging and sales channels to customers, so I don't think SpaceX would have that much of competitive edge (except having more satellites). Some Earth imaging is provided by governments for free, says Wikipedia's Satellite imagery, including Landsat, MODIS, and ASTER for the U.S. alone. There are lots of private providers with high resolution, like down to 41 cm, so they probably have big imaging systems on their satellites.
As I understand it, the super high resolution satellites have to be super large because you run into optical limits on the lens structure. The Maxar 30cm resolution ones are the size of a small school bus.
While there's probably a market for imagery that's low resolution and ultra-fast refresh, it'd still add mass and complicate things and starlink is already a complicated project.
I half expect the next move will be space-based datacenters. I can imagine twitter's new owner seeing the benefits in hosting entirely outside the jurisdiction of any government.
I half expect the next move will be space-based datacenters.
The thermal management would be a nightmare
I believe that international treaties require that each orbiting object be marked with the responsible nation, and that that nation has jurisdiction over it. I don't know how the International Space Station is handled. I could probably quickly search for it, but I shouldn't be spending time on this at the moment anyway (working hours).
Yeah, though honestly Elon could actually make his own country at this point and/or launch from international water.
I used to like elon but after watching him handle Twitter he seems to be getting more and more unstable. Every headline I see about him I think this guy is terminally online.
Howard Hughes syndrome? Becoming rich enough to involve the news reading public in your mania...
Same here.. bring back early-spacex elon. It seems like he forgot about his dream colonizing mars and focusing on destroying the world instead. sigh.
He was just better concealed behind the propaganda. he's always been a POS
Nah, if he is always a fraud from the start, he wouldn't be able to save Tesla and make SpaceX very dominant technologically like today.
He become real shit after pandemic. He feels like a god because spacex successes and Tesla's stock somehow balooned while others tanked. Then it goes downhill from there. From his defiance against covid protocol, his participation on crypto shit, twitter saga, etc. He is in a state when he think he can bend reality according to his will. And he will try to prove it at the cost of everything he has. Sigh.
Pro-Russian?
Shown on many occasions in the last years
Care to be more specific?
Gave ukraine starlink, then restricted usage
Suggested and argued that ukraine should surrender
Just from the top of the head.. he also enabled/renewed banned far right and straight up nazi, even pedo accounts although that is not necessarily Russia-adjacent stuff
And there is more in few google searches
Honestly, what? You're just making stuff up. If he was in favor of Russia he'd have never given access to Starlink in the first place. That was a huge strategic advantage for Ukraine.
SpaceX spent 100 million on supporting Ukraine. I don't think any other company has funded Ukraine's defense efforts with that amount of money
There's no evidence he did any such thing. He's like Trump - he just lies and hopes no one fact checks. He refuses to provide evidence and we've had reporting that the US government is actually the one paying
He is a con and his fans cucks watching him try to fuck everyone over
Concern troll