this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

c/Environment

1 readers
3 users here now

A community dedicated to environmental topics discussing climate change, renewable energy, ecosystems across the biosphere, and more.


Please Observe Instance Rules:

  1. Do not violate any laws, third-party rights, and/or proprietary rights.
  2. Do not harass others, be abusive, threatening, and/or harmful.
  3. Do not be needlessly defamatory and/or intentionally misleading.
  4. Do not upload without marking obscene and/or sensitive content as such.
  5. Do not promote racism, bigotry, hatred, harm, and violence of any kind.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Orvanis@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Headline feels a bit click-baity. They do say that their model shows temperatures correct if we remove carbon. It just isn't an immediate effect, instead taking about 200 years after being removed...

So long term, removing carbon is still absolutely the correct thing to do.