this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22058 readers
76 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In 2022, Google made upwards of $30 billion in revenue from the sale of ad space on publishers’ websites which was six times the digital advertising revenue of all U.S. news publications combined, according to a statement by Gannett.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jck2905@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds like good news to me. The article also states the doj and eu have launched similar lawsuits. Any reason this could be bad?

[–] takelgryph@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Given how much Gannett is to blame for newspaper consolidation and the resulting shitshow, this feels more like a "let them fight" at best.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Gannett: My actions have disastrous consequences. We should sue Google!

[–] Domiku@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah -- I'm in the "let both of the capitalist megacorps lose" camp.

[–] rothaine@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Lawyers on both sides: 💰💰💰

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Any win for Gannett is not a win for journalism, it's a win for shareholders. Whether that's bad depends on your views.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Newspapers had local monopolies for decades, so they're well positioned to understand monopoly practices. Gannett is throwing a tantrum because consolidation-via-underpants-gnomes logic alongside "partnerships" with online companies handed that monopoly to someone else.

Totally self inflicted.

load more comments
view more: next ›