this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
12 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't even tell which side is before and which side is after

[–] Walk_On@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In both pictures, the left is before and the right is after.

[–] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Weird how it desaturates in the first one but adds saturation in the second one

[–] flan@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

i have a feeling one of the pictures has it reversed but we can't tell because we're looking at screenshots of screenshots

[–] davel@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I, too, am a philistine who finds these changes to be, if not imperceptible then inconsequential.

[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I just thought the second one looked better on the right and the first one looked better on the left

[–] davel@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

FWIW I was being sincere, about myself anyway; I can’t speak for you.

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It might be much more noticable as an actual video, or at the full 4K resolution, but posting these low-resolution still side-by-sides just makes the OP look like a snob.

[–] Walk_On@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but posting these low-resolution still side-by-sides just makes the OP look like a snob.

Wait, what? lol

I don’t think you know what the word ‘snob’ means.

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a person who believes that their tastes in a particular area are superior to those of other people.

I.E. someone who rants about one thing being significantly worse than another, but provides examples of the two things that are basically indistinguishable from one another.

Like I said, maybe the actual video supports the point, these shrunken still screenshots do not.

[–] Walk_On@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

lol logout

someone who rants about one thing being significantly worse than another, but provides examples of the two things that are basically indistinguishable from one another.

That’s not what a snob is. I just posted links to the pictures so you can see for yourself. It definitely isn’t indistinguishable, especially if you look at Tom Arnold’s face. It’s quite the opposite actually and if calling out weird AI smoothing is being a snob than it seems a large portion of people are.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

Short answer brrrrrrrrrrrr

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

It's just a movie, not a full TV series or whatever. In absolutely certain the original reels or negatives exist to do a real upscale. For most things I'd rather just keep the original home release quality and leaven it as is, or at least DVD quality for most I should say. Horror movies should be vhs quality as well as certain comedies etc. But if you're gonna do it, don't half ass the process. A lot of people worked really fucking hard to make it look how it does and having an AI paint all over it and call it better is crap.

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh no the movie that literally inspired the "dirka dirka mohammed jihad" "gag" isn't preserved perfectly noooooooooooo retvrn pls

[–] Walk_On@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I’m not really a huge fan of this movie, it’s just the two examples that have gotten the most discussion. Cameron has applied this to several of his other films that have been re-released in 4k and it serves as a bad precedent towards how much filmmakers choose to manipulate and change their past works like Lucas did.

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, God. Cameron is going down the George Lucas route. Hearing Darth Vader scream, "Nooooo!" as he carried Palpatine and seeing people cry to that killed a part of me.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

DO NOT WANT!!!!!

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

People act like True Lies is a good movie when it's insufferable. The Terminator is the only good film Cameron ever made. Maybe Aliens on a good day.

[–] Yeat@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

excuse me way of water exists

[–] Yeat@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] utopologist@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Abyss fucking sucks, in my personal opinion

[–] Yeat@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

damn LMAO i know someone else that hates that movie and i don’t really get why

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look up the abuse he put the cast through.

[–] winky88@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That has nothing to do with the quality of the movie.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

It has a lot to do with why people didn't like it though.

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IMO it's incredibly mediocre except for the CGI, which is pretty good but not good enough to make me watch the whole boring ass movie just for that.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

cant believe AI turned a swarthy Austrian like Arnold into a white man

[–] flan@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

which one's which?

[–] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

The AI one looks so desaturated it looks like a Bourne movie

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 1 year ago

To be honest, the second picture dosen't look bad. It had a more modern photography that can hurt the sensibilities of people who remember it with a more hot color temperature, but it also dosen't looks like a TV movie now.

[–] Walk_On@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SerLava@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

LOOK AT THE SHIRT!!

There is literally, literally no possibility that his shirt isn't constantly warping frame to frame into random shapes. It's just reinventing the ripped parts, and his skin underneath. Insane!