this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
256 points (97.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9747 readers
444 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 72 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If your neighborhood has an HOA, pressure them into adding language that limits the number of rental properties. It can take a lot of work / votes to pass, but it can be done.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We did this with our COA (condo owners association). No renters or AirBNBs allowed. If you own the condo you've gotta live in it.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

I've been trying to get my hoa onboard for rental limit.

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 63 points 11 months ago

How about Jeff Bezos fucks off?

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure would be a shame if we got candidates for governing bodies that would actually do something about this.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I looking to run anyone want help support my bud for office. Definitely will want to put a stop to this kind of stuff.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 26 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I think corporations should be limited to owning a small quantity of sfh. Maybe a dozen unless they can show a compelling reason such as housing for employees.

Sfh are meant for families.

[–] netburnr@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We don't want company towns, there should be no exceptions.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

Maybe put in a few exceptions for things like remote research or production facilities where no real town or civilization in general exists around them. Basically the kind where rotating worker shifts are stationed for 3-6 months at a time and then move back for a few months off.

[–] Iamdanno@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Brb, going to set up 100 LLCs to each own a dozen single-family homes.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago

You don't place the limit on the company you place the limit on the region. Just like zoning often requires a certain amount of green space you write regulations that only 10-25% of all single family homes can be owned by corporations.

[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just scale the tax, it’s so fucking easy to fix. But if they wait it’ll become a giant problem where some awful company or groups of company will fail and break the economy for a while etc etc.

All you have to do is scale the tax. 1 house normal tax rate. 2 houses 2x tax rate on all properties. 3 houses 3x the tax rate on all properties.

Numbers probably need adjusting but that keeps things reasonable, even for small landlords you can scale it so its fair and keeps properties local and even a good investment vehicle for individuals but prevent it from becoming an exploitive market by giants corps.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago

Trump changed salt for personal taxes. Just make the rules cover corporations as well. I got fucked in salt

[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Zillow lost their shirt doing the same thing.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Zillow was trying to flip.

[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

True. Outright rent-seeking is certainly typically safer than flipping.

I think the risks that crushed Zillow are still relevant: Trying to do something at national scale requires a situation where lack of local knowledge is unnecessary. And housing has proven a few times not to be that.

I would bet on Amazon to come up with an "investment" scheme that externalizes the extreme local market risks to their "partners".

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I just don't like large corporations buying up the housing. It just drives the cost up. I am not against local landlords. I had rented many times when I didn't want to buy and I appreciate clean, affordable, and well-maintained properties. Local landlords can only buy so many properties before they run out of cash, as such the market limits itself. Bezos can buy a lot of homes before he even puts a dent into his cash funds. There are times when corporate ownership makes sense, I had a friend who traveled to BFE for weeks a time and his company owned a house where he could stay. They always had someone out there for weeks or months at a time.

[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Agreed on all points.

Some communities pass laws to keep investor landlords out entirely.

Amazon buying rental property might also be ruled illegal under current anti-trust laws.

I don't know the best approach, but I don't expect good things to come from Amazon getting into the landlord business.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Amazon isn’t involved. This is another company.

[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Good point, but really beside the point.

Anyone who thinks Bezos' controlling interests in both companies won't cause public harm should consider my fine selection of bridges that I'm selling for ridiculous bargains.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

He will not cause harm because of Amazon, he will cause harm because he's Bezos.

[–] Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Can Anyone Tell Me Why All Articles Related To Moronic People Has Capital Letters On Each Word? It Triggers Me So Much For Some Reason.

[–] teft@startrek.website 48 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That is called title case. It's used in titles.

[–] TheMauveAvenger@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They went overboard here, to be fair. Articles and short prepositions shouldn't be capitalized in title case. It is funny to think that an adult has gone through their entire life without seeing title case, though.

[–] teft@startrek.website 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They went overboard here, to be fair.

Oh absolutely, I was just answering in case they legit didn't know about title case.

[–] CyanFen@lemmy.one 9 points 11 months ago

Never assume an idiot online is an adult. There's like a LOOOT of actual children all over the internet

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm sure that Bezos will require that "work from home" is not allowed in any of his leases.

or perhaps lease PRIME will, for a fee, let you work from your rental.