this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
22 points (95.8% liked)

Political Memes

5431 readers
2421 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hexbear and .ml covering their ears and yelling "lalalalala"

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lemee speedrunning defederation

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ohmygod one person said something about me. Quick defed from the entire instance!!

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Nah it's been nearly constantly and consistently bad quality posts and toxicity from that instance.

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am glad to announce you guys that number of tankies here is below 4% according to up/downvotes

It's low enough to know them by their usernames and shame them every time they post something

[–] PilferJynx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as they're genuine and civil about their opinions, I encourage a space for that discussion. If it's disingenuous trolling or crude propaganda then it becomes a problem.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it's disingenuous trolling or crude propaganda then it becomes a problem.

That's what tankies do almost by definition. You're talking about the rare breed of communists who aren't tankies.

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It's not rare. There are just a lot of loud, terminally online people on Lemmy.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What gives any arbitrary country a mandate to exist though? We recognize that plenty of other social institutions are transient. Nobody demanded a massive international intervention to continue the existence of the Whig Party or the Studebaker Corporation. Why are countries unique and special? Also, this seems like a very modern thing: nobody is demanding we bring back Tanganyika or unwind German unification.

I get the desire to preserve the Ukranian culture and community. But you don't need a sovereign nation for that: compare the re-establishment of the Welsh language and culture, for example.

Would the population have been better off-- at least in the "not exploded" sense-- by backing down with a quick surrender in exchange for some "we'll formally tolerate your cultural differences" legal concessions? I'm sure at this point, it's impractical to negotiate to that, because there's too much bloodshed and burnt bridges on both sides, but it seemed like it was never even on the table: the Western world decided an independent Ukraine had to exist even if everyone involved knew it was going to be a very painful and expensive endeavour to keep it.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

... Ukraine decided an independent Ukraine had to exist. They voted for independence in 1991, with over 90% in favor. Ukrainian relations with Russia soured after Russia decided to invade and annex part of Ukraine that they had formerly promised to respect the sovereignity of. Russia is an oligarchy with no controls on the behavior of its leader, who has openly signaled that he believes that Ukrainians are just a kind of inferior Russian who need to be taught their place. The West offered the Ukrainian president refuge. The Ukrainian president refused and chose to stay in his country. Hundreds of men and women sacrificed themselves in the opening days of the invasion to buy their country time to resist. Millions have volunteered.

What deal, exactly, do you expect to be made in that situation? In what way was any of that the West's decision?

Take a step back, and rethink your approach to this. Ukrainians are capable of making their own decisions.

[–] danielfgom@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is false. Russia has not moved 1cm beyond the southern states where Russians live and were being exterminated by Ukrainian forces.

Putin is not interested in taking all of Ukraine. He could have easily done it by now. Ukrainian army is a joke and virtually non existent now.

The Russians have only been defending their positions, not moving forward to take new ground.

[–] samtoxie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Guys we found the indoctrinated Russian, send him some help

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

This isn't going to change anyone's mind. The pro-Russia folk believe that Ukraine as a nation never existed in the first place, so they are fine with below option. The top one is just wishful thinking - why would they stop fighting? They stand nothing to gain from this and they'd lose everything they fought so hard to gain.

I'll get down-voted yet again, but I'll keep saying this: If you care about Ukraine - join the war, send in the troops. Otherwise - shut the fuck up. Spamming the flag everywhere does not help. Sending weapons doesn't really turn the tides either. Cheering Ukrainian soldiers into a suicidal counter-offensive - well that's an especially fucked up thing to do.