this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
498 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3498 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Washington Post: Donald Trump can be held civilly liable for the actions of the mob that attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, an appeals court ruled Friday in a long-awaited decision that could clear the way for lawsuits seeking financial damages from the former president.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 83 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Can we get a nationwide class action lawsuit going?

[–] Rockyrikoko@lemm.ee 41 points 11 months ago (3 children)

He detonated the deep personal relationships I had with half my friends and most of my family, what's that worth?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But I could buy three freedoms for that price.

[–] FrostyTrichs@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

You can get like 600 freedoms and a bunch of free shit you don't want on Temu for a ducket and a half.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Is any part of you secretly ok with coming to know deeper who they really were? Like, do you think he actually instilled anything that wasn't already latent, he didn't just fan the flame a little?

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Couldn't have been that deep if they get detonated over a man like Trump

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

He has some hold over people and I'm serious. I'm not about policing my families thoughts and ideas but even if I were there the entire time to keep things in perspective there's probably little I could have done.

They are still family but in the coming end times I'll seriously reconsider ever trusting them with anything big or small.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

I don't believe that, I think that the same people who froth at the mouth over supporting Trump were always shitheads they just kept it under wraps. Trump gives them an excuse, he doesn't control them. As evidenced by what happened on Jan. 6th.

[–] Syringe@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It sounds like you're diminishing or don't understand the level of polarity that this has created. My family are now Nazis. Not like a little bit. Not like an exaggeration. Like... "Restore power to the master race and eradicate everyone else"

These are not the people I grew up with. How do I break bread with these people? How do I share a table with enemies of democracy and the Constitution? How many screaming matches and fist fights (yes) do I get into calling them on their bullshit before I'm supposed to give up? How do I avoid taking about politics when they turn literally everything into a challenge or litmus test?

This is anecdotal, so take this all with a grain of salt, but there aren't many people that I've talked to that don't have a similar story. I just don't think you're giving enough credence to the damage that trump and the fascists are doing to the fabric of America.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, my point is that Trump didn't create these people. He didn't somehow worm his way into their brains and force them to agree with fascist ideologies.

I'm sorry to say it but your family/chosen family chose their path, and it seems like they chose it over you. That's all I meant by it couldn't have been that deep, not that your side wasn't deep. It seems like you were surrounded by bad people and just didn't see it.

[–] Syringe@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Again, I think you're not understanding how drastic this has been. These are people that have been brainwashed and radicalized. They have become addicted to outrage and pushed into an echo chamber, furthering their descent. It is insidious what happened to these people.

I think I understand the point you're trying to make, but I don't think I can bite. "if they fell for it, they must've been awful people who didn't love you enough" feels very "No true Scotsman" and I can't shake the logical fallacy of it.

No. Trump did not create these people. Thirty years of propaganda did. Fox news playing on televisions in police stations, military bases, and hospital waiting rooms did. Trump was the culmination of a dark and fucked up anti American plot by Republicans, but not really the cause of it.

Still though, I think you may not understand the real gravity of what's occurring. Reasonable people are being corrupted into hate by decades of propaganda. Assholitry is being weaponized into extremism, and all of these people are true believers. This is eroding something at the very basic core of our society, and the election of Trump signaled the start of a full scale war on democracy. Dismissing the efficacy and severity of this is cavalier.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

Christ, no my guy. The one not understanding the point is you.

Trump is a literal smoothbrain troglodyte. He is a genuinely stupid person and he's somehow managed to convince the people that support him of otherwise.

Trump did not create them. They were primed for him. Which means any half brained sociopath on the right can easily take his place, to much more damning consequences.

The problem you're fixated on is a symptom. Stop acting like Trump is some puppetmaster.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
[–] jopepa@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think there’s a good risk enough people on the left and right would frame these checks for different reasons and not cash them.

[–] gac11@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Now that we can cash checks with pictures in an app, we can get our sweet, sweet cash and frame it!

[–] jopepa@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

ModernProblems.jpeg

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Doesn't matter. The money will still be collected, held, and distributed by law enforcement.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Freedom costs a buck oh five

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Freedom isn't free! No, there's a hefty fuckin' fee! And if you don't throw in your buck o' five Who wiiiiill?!

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 66 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Let the pile-on begin!

I'm considering suing Trump for intentional infliction of emotional distress caused by his riots and rioters.

And I'll seek $11,780,000 in damages.

Who's in?

[–] mibo80@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago

That's all we need. We're just asking him to find it.

[–] TheRealLinga@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Shouldn't need that for a civil sentence, but stay ready.

[–] Locuralacura@lemm.ee 27 points 11 months ago

Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it!Do it! Do it!

[–] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

This is wealth redistribution at its finest. MAGAt donors --> Those who've been harmed by Trump, et al.

[–] muse@kbin.social 23 points 11 months ago

Looks like meat's back on the menu, boys!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the supporters that were following his orders should sue him too.

[–] n0m4n@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

This court drew a line that separates Presidential conduct and civil conduct. This reinforces the other courts ruling against rioters, who were asking for leniency or exoneration because they were "following the Commander in Chief's orders." In short, their dumb-assery is on them.

[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Another hole in his claims of Total Presidential Monarchy.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Someone should move on it like a bitch.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 13 points 11 months ago (5 children)

As of this writing, this thread has 11 comments, and 2 of them are LOTR references.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago

One does not simply walk into comment threads expecting no LOTR references.

[–] muse@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

I'm proud to have done my part

[–] Newguy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kase@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago
[–] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 2 points 11 months ago

less than half of what you'd hoped for?

[–] Rally@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

You have my axe?

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A whole raft of lawsuits against a guy who can only attract the absolute worst lawyers? Game on.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

That's like they've pulled the goalie.

[–] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ooooooh! FUN!

So we are gonna see just a giant wave of civil suits.

[–] ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

And my axe!