this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
168 points (91.2% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6623 readers
585 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nuke@yah.lol 36 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m honestly not convinced this was even an oversight. It’s a pretty legit flex, tbh: “We’re gonna explosively dismantle your stuff with an orbiting heavy gunship and there ain’t shit you can do about it. But you can watch us do it in real time on flightaware, so enjoy that!”

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A C-130 isn't exactly stealthy at the best of times, they're, big, loud, and presumably have a massive radar return. They're also flying in visual conditions at reasonably low level, so can be easily seen.

They probably decided colliding with another aircraft was a bigger hazard.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

H models are pretty loud with those thicc prop blades but Js are surprisingly quiet in flight

[–] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago

Not to mention they fly at altitudes that make it far more likely that you hear your little clay bunker next door get fragged before you hear the gunship. The zoom on those guns make them essentially crew-served howitzer sniper rifles.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago

Doom noodle

[–] H4mi@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I showed this picture to my 10yo. He immediately guessed ”AC killing terrorists?” due to the flight pattern.

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

You raisin him right. Much respect

[–] Amanduh@kbin.social 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Can I have some context please? :)

[–] nuke@yah.lol 42 points 11 months ago

An Air Force AC-130 gunship destroyed a truck on Tuesday in Western Iraq after the aircraft’s crew watched Iranian-backed militia fighters use the vehicle to launch a ballistic missile attack on U.S. troops, injuring eight Americans, defense officials said.

“Immediately following the attack, a U.S. military AC-130 aircraft in the area conducted a self-defense strike against an Iranian-backed militia vehicle and a number of Iranian-backed militia personnel involved in this attack,” according to U.S. Central Command, or CENTCOM. “This self-defense strike resulted in several enemy casualties.”

https://taskandpurpose.com/news/us-military-ac-130-iraq/

[–] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Context? Thanks.

Edit:

Nvm found it.

[–] Amends1782@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Positively dying to see the footage from the crew