this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
148 points (99.3% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how they got the money to fight against regulations.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This seems to be subtle jab at people who buy dead animals which led lives of misery, in order to eat them and their products.

As one of those people (occasionally), I agree with you. It's way too easy to blame the evil companies. They only exist because we voluntarily pay them to do what they do. We are all responsible.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We are all responsible.

I mean, I am not. I just... stopped doing that. Pretty fucking easy solution.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For a lot of people it's not that easy, apparently. But well done.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We don't know if was easy for them. It takes some time to get new recipes, learn about different potential new foods and read ingredients. And maybe you get to a point where you have to buy something non-food and consider what is made from.

Nobody has the same problems in a world where animal products are so abundant but those who do face them getting more and it is now easy in most parts of the world.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I dunno, you can't really levy the blame against everyone. More and more, people are given less choice to buy better quality food over cheap factory produced food. The supermarkets present you with a choice between cheap factory food and slightly more expensive factory food.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 9 points 11 months ago

The poorest eat the least meat, lentils, chickpeas, beans and rice are cheaper everywhere. Ask me how I know.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

This is a classic question of intuition. Personally I see your argument as a cop-out. By definition the supermarkets are just selling us what we want. That's what supermarkets do, they're not charities. If you want (somewhat) cruelty-free meat, it's available in the organic shop across the road and it costs four times as much. Suddenly you don't care so much about the chickens, right? Not blaming you or anyone in particular. This is who we are as humans. We want it tasty, we want it cheap, and the rest is something of an abstraction.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 18 points 11 months ago

Supported by 89% of Europeans and killed by a handful of rich people. I'm sure none of us are surprised.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 15 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Meat lobby groups fought a “hard and dirty” war against a planned EU ban on caged hens and pigs that has now been shelved, the Guardian can reveal.

In 2021 EU politicians took the radical step of agreeing to phase out the use of cages for rearing farmed animals, including hens, broilers, pigs, calves, rabbits and quails, after receiving a petition signed by more than a million people.

But a ferocious pushback from powerful farming lobbies, details of which have been seen by an investigation by the Guardian and a media consortium led by Lighthouse Reports, means that the legislation now appears to be on hold.

At one point a number of groups submitted a 60-page analysis arguing that a positive European Food Safety Authority (Efsa) assessment of the planned package was not “impartial” and contained “serious scientific errors”.

This gloomy line was reinforced by another letter to the commission from the muscular EU farm union Copa-Cogeca, which said that Efsa’s opinion would “lead to the loss of most of the European poultry sector, meat and eggs combined”.

ELV is not listed in the EU’s transparency registry and the group declined to answer questions about its funding, how it was set up, or its lobbying on the animal welfare package.


The original article contains 888 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

Exactly as expected