this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
201 points (96.3% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2204 readers
139 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It released almost a ton of CO~2~.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But hey, it’s on you to save the goddamn planet somehow

[–] kia@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I haven't used a plastic straw in years.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I make sure to recycle all of my 2 liter bottles.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Plastic straws have nothing to do with climate change.

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ok i agree totally with the Elon hate, but sometimes you need to take a plane to the airport next door for maintenance or something. They can’t just throw it on a truck and drive it over there.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 months ago

abolish private jets. problem solved

[–] Dippy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

This. Same shenanigans with Taylor Swift last year. Still not great, and still could fly commercial, but even those need to be moved to other locations with no passengers/cargo from time to time.

Edit: where is that “thermonuclear lawsuit” we were promised.

Double edit: in fairness he did follow through! https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/20/tech/x-sues-media-matters/index.html

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if there was a semi-private commercial airline if it would be popular. Like more expensive than business class, but you still share with like 20-30 other people.

The problem might be that it needs to have destination that are popular amongst that group of people and enough to fill it. So you end up with three lines…

[–] Cosmicomical@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Those are totally a thing. You can time-share a jet

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I know about time sharing a private jet (or simply renting one). I was looking for something between first class and private. Like you still get 1, 2, 4 seats and share the rest. AFAIK you get the whole plane to yourself if you time share.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Anyone can file legal process. Need to survive motions to strike and summary judgment before you say he followed through. I think it's going to get tossed within a few weeks.

[–] Cosmicomical@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Yes but if all the 100s of passengers had private jets, there would be 100s of extra flights. This argument is apologist nonsense

[–] kia@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair point, but why fly to Pflugerville in the first place? He could have flown directly from Brownsville to Austin and drove to Pflugerville.

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Austin executive is a really nice airport? Not sure really but likely the plane needed work and they scheduled with someone there, or they picked someone up or something. Could be anything.

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Could be anything.

could be cheaper to park there overnight .

could be he wanted nachos from some place. either way, 15 mile hops are bullshit.

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

Who doesn’t love nachos?

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's OK. He's going to save humanity and settle the stars by ... ah ... killing hundreds of idiots who think he can actually get them to Mars.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago

Stockton Rush gave him a special deal on carbon fiber for the dome habitats

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder when people are going to start to notice once the Mars flights start that he never seems to be on any of them?

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You make it sound like you believe that Mars flights will ever start! 😜

He's a grifter. Everything he says and does is a grift. There won't ever be a Mars flight. The Mars flight crap is there so that his starry-eyed youngster engineers will kill themselves working toward that grand vision so he has a launch vehicle to pollute LEO with Starlink crap.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only reason I think they might start is that Gwen Shotwell is doing a pretty good job keeping him away from anything important at SpaceX. But I can't help but notice that even though SpaceX is taking people into orbit, he doesn't seem to volunteer. You'd think he would want to know what weightlessness is like if he's planning on getting his ass to Mars.

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

The technological hurdles that have to be cleared to send a manned mission to Mars are not currently surmountable by any institution, government or private, on the planet. We're not even talking about colonizing here, just sending humans to Mars at all is currently fantasy with any technology that anybody on the planet has.

SpaceX will be bankrupted by the antics of Space Karen (a.k.a. Apartheid Edgelord) long before the first manned mission of any size makes it to Mars.

[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m not a rocket surgeon, but can the emissions really weigh more than the fuel?

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely and that's how chemistry works, basically you take some hydrocarbons(a bunch of H and C) and you add oxygens to them. I know it is weird to think of burning this way because you see the thing burnt disappear but remember that mass cannot be created or destroyed. Burning is really just adding two masses together and getting some waste heat in the process. What is left over from the process is going to be the weight of both the mass and it takes a lot of oxygen to burn jet fuel. Hence why the missions weigh so much more than the jet fuel.

[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the explanation

[–] towerful@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I imagine it includes the extraction, processing and delivery of the fuel?

From a rudimentary chemistry understanding, changing a lighter hydrogen atom for a heavier oxygen atom (burning hydrocarbon -> H2O + CO2) will increase the mass. I dunno how applicable that is in the real world tho

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The atoms themselves aren't changing, you'd have to do fusion or fission for that. It's the molecules that are changing.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

I meant "swapping" a hydrogen atom for an oxygen atom within a molecule as part of the chemical reaction of combustion.
I didn't explain it well, tho

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That's why you need to buy his shitty cars, so he can save the planet.