128
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kynuck97@hexbear.net 54 points 10 months ago

The New Yorker is living in a fantasy world - there is no past, there is no history, there is only the now.

'WHY AREN'T YOUNG PEOPLE PROTESTING BUSH'S INVASION OF IRAQ?' - the new yorker probably, circa 2023

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 25 points 10 months ago

"why haven't young people invented time travel and killed hitler?" - the new yorker probably

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 22 points 10 months ago

There ain't even a future beyond quarterly economic reports and the next election cycle when it comes to big press outlets in this cursed country.

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 45 points 10 months ago

what does it mean that young activists are protesting President Joe Biden, not Xi Jinping or Donald Trump?

it means THAT NEITHER XI OR TRUPM ARE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES HOLY FUCK WHAT A STUPID QUESTION

[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 39 points 10 months ago

the only thing i'd protest xi for is not beating biden to death with a stick

[-] Parsani@hexbear.net 36 points 10 months ago

Are there Chinese bombs being dropped on Gaza right now?

[-] BeanBoy@hexbear.net 36 points 10 months ago
[-] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 34 points 10 months ago

The article isn't terrible, it paints this as a split between progressives and liberals, akin to the Wallace V. Truman split. Then they ask if running Biden again will be enough when he's clearly lost the support of progressives. It's the liberal friendly version of what we were saying with "Bernie would have won"

[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 32 points 10 months ago

It's the liberal friendly version of what we were saying with "Bernie would have won"

Here's a fun theoretical question: how much would be different right now if Bernie was president, with all consideration to how he's behaved to this point in time

[-] axont@hexbear.net 8 points 10 months ago

If Sanders were president then the Democrats would have made their own version of the Tea Party, like the Republicans did in 2012. The Democrats would have tried courting finance or tech or something for money, you'd hear a lot about something like "new liberalism" and there would be a new crop of absolute ghouls winning elections.

Republicans would try to position themselves as rational moderates. Not sure what else they'd do.

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 13 points 10 months ago

Writers don’t write their own headlines

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 30 points 10 months ago

Trump isn't in charge and Xi doesn't give Isreal billions in free aid, next question

[-] axont@hexbear.net 14 points 10 months ago

China does sell guns to Israel which sucks. They also sell guns to both sides of the Kashmir conflict. But at least it's not free aid and China doesn't outlaw BDS.

[-] davel@hexbear.net 29 points 10 months ago

xigma-male They hate us for our high speed rail.

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 22 points 10 months ago

these twitter leftists are making a major fuss about the situation in Israel, and yet I don't see a single one of them acknowledging the lives lost in the explostion of the U.S.S. Maine?

[-] davel@hexbear.net 20 points 10 months ago

The only things The New Yorker’s got going for it are the serial comma and the diaeresis.

[-] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago

The British are right about the Oxford comma, use it only where it avoids ambiguity.

The diaresis is sick tho

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 12 points 10 months ago
[-] Smeagolicious@hexbear.net 7 points 10 months ago

Pig, poop, and balls

[-] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 5 points 10 months ago
[-] davel@hexbear.net 10 points 10 months ago

JöhnBröwnNötë, ïs, nöt, ön, böärd.

[-] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 12 points 10 months ago

Some good replies at least

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 10 points 10 months ago
[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago

Okay if you read the article title with your head in the gutter (metaphorically) this is very different

[-] M68040@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Because Xi’s a pretty normal guy and Donald being a egregious shithead can be taken for granted

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
128 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15892 readers
379 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS