this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
67 points (91.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40219 readers
977 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
67
Suggestions to new networking gear (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Bimbleby@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hi, and sorry in advance if this is the wrong community to post this. But I seek some advice on how I can upgrade my home networking setup that also connects my selfhosted services.

I have posted a shitty Visio that visualized my current setup, but just to describe it in some words.

I use an aging Amplifi HD router and access point, that is connected through wireless to a mesh point.

It works, but I am aware how much of the throughput disappears when connecting through the meshpoint. And I would also like to utilize newer technologies like Wifi 6 (i already have devices that support this standard) or even 6E.

So I thought about switching the router to a dedicated one without a wireless access point, and then wire an access point to provide wireless access.

While I was at it, it could be interesting going from gigabit to 2.5 for the wired devices. One of the homelabs could be modified to utilize it. Or at least just gain the possibility in a future upgrade, by getting a router that supports it while I am at it.

My question is, what would you suggest I upgraded with? I'm open for OpenWRT or PFsense/OPNsense, and keeping things modular.

Edit: and I am located within the EU, if it has any bearing on what devices are available without crazy import duties.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tty5@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Budget (about 200 euro):

  • Mikrotik hex s router
  • TP-Link eap610 access point
  • Unmanaged trendnet switch

Better(400-500 euro):

TP-Link omada line is basically a bunch of ubiquity clones at much lower price

[–] Bimbleby@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is exactly the kind of input I was looking for, thank you!

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'd suggest looking into the Unifi product line. They have products that meet your needs and then some. I believe the company is based out of the EU so you are likely good in imports.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Seconded on the Unifi line

[–] feminalpanda@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yea, same company makes the amplify line. Depending on bandwidth they could get a usg, or udm. Then a poe switch and a poe AP.

[–] Bimbleby@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Very tempting, as I am accustomed to Amplifi, and I like their access points a lot. But if I am to achieve above 1 Gbps wired speeds, it appears that I have to go for the UDM Pro which I think is quite above the mark. It seems like many other options have opened up, like a retrofitted Fujitsu S920 as I commented to another.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't that the cloud shit?

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

Nope. It can be cloud if you want it to, but generally, you can host your own controller. I run the controller in a docker container, personally.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago

I would definitely go Opnsense for the router, it's much more flexible than other options. You can get various Intel mini-PCs with very low power usage that have 2.5GbE ports.

For the APs I'm pretty happy with my Unifi setup, but I've heard decent things about TP-Link Omada hardware too.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago
  • Raspberry Pi 4 + TP-Link UE300, w/ OpenWrt
  • Netgear G308 switch, any GigE switch would do
  • Ubiquiti AC access point, second hand from eBay

Supports gigabit speeds with SQM (QoS) over Ethernet and up to 400Mbps over WiFi in its current form.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought about switching the router to a dedicated one without a wireless access point

Is there a reason for this? Unless it has specific issues you'd like to fix, I'd just keep using the current router and simply disable its WiFi.

[–] Bimbleby@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would be from the assumptions that typical routers that do everything, tends to be underpowered. One thing I looked at was repurposing a second hand Fujitsu S920 for the task of being a router. But again, I am just spitballing, seeking inspiration.

[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 2 points 1 year ago

"underpowered" routers are usually underpowered for multiple high bandwidth wireless connections. if you disable the wireless, shoving bits over copper would -usually- be efficient enough to not be the bottleneck.

[–] bookworm@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

S920

I'm running this as my router. It handles a 500/500mbit connection over WireGuard for me without a problem. CPU usage can spike up to 80% when I push it as much as I can, so depending on how it scales I'm not 100% sure how it would handle 1gbit routing+vpn for example.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It might be underpowered, it might not be. Just test it out? Do you notice performance issues related to your router?

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Have a look at the Bananapi options, especially the R3. (Or the R2, it's a bit more mature)

It's a very capable single board computer with onboard managed switch, including SFP cages. If you want, you can buy antennas and utilise the wifi 6, or get a dedicated access point.

PFsense, openwrt, et al all have images. I think some people also run the mikrotik OS on it. It's powerful enough to run as a hypervisor so you can chop and change between all of these if you want.

It gets bonus points for accepting 5G modems for failover.

[–] Skullkid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've heard good things about TP Link WAP as well. They have some that support 2.5G/Wifi6. I like pfsense if it is available in your country/budget for firewall. I use a virtual appliance but it's essentially the same thing software wise. It has a bit of a learning curve and but it's a very common enterprise level firewall so the skills you learn will be transferrable not just to work (if you work in IT) but also to other firewalls like fortinet, Palo Alto, etc. because the fundamental firewall principles are the same even if the GUI and specific features are not.

[–] Bimbleby@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I work with the Azure cloud infrastructure, with quite a bit of networking included, so it's one of the motivations of not necessarily taking the easy route. What hardware are you using?

[–] Skullkid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh nice. For mine personally I have a proxmox server and pfsense is one of my vms. It's not my edge router though because I am not passing through the nic it is using directly to the firewall so technically it would be proxmox virtual switch on the edge which I don't inherently trust so my provider router is at the edge and I just port forward any ports for services I need. This can all be simplified of you just get a physical appliance from netgate website lol. I'm planning on doing so myself in the near future. It's a great product though software wise once you get the hang of it it's fairly straightforward. Fortigate also has home equipment but I think it comes with license cost. I'd look into it if you have money to spend because they are another industry leader.

[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Hi!I see a lot of great suggestions here but I was just looking at your chart and I think just one fundamental change would benefit you.

Think of your switch as the "core" of your network. Everything should connect to that switch (computers, access points, firewall) for your best experience/performance.

If you go with unifi, you should know that their switches are managed but if you intend to self host anything, you're actually going to want the managed features!

Thanks and goodluck!

[–] feminalpanda@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is your bandwidth from your ISP?

[–] Bimbleby@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The ONT allows for 1Gbs up and down, through fibre. But the possibility of buying more is possible. Having multi gig within the network, was more for internal communication and keeping options open for future upgrades.

[–] Oisteink@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Why the unmanaged switch? Putting servers on a switch I like to know that the switch can handle VLAN and link aggregation.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I have similar to your current but my AP is able to be connected via cat 5 instead of mesh.