IPC standing for Inter Process Communication in this instance.
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
71 points (98.6% liked)
Linux
48224 readers
826 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
What else would it stand for?
It's instructions per clock/cycle in a hardware context, because you can't use clock speeds to compare performance between processors.
That is true...
Interastral Peace Corp
What about Intraastral Peace Corps?
Instructions per cycle
Was what I first read anyways
I find it annoying when an article contains ATANE.
Clear case of DOTA.
This is the kind of high-quality technical discussion I don't understand a word of that rarely surfaced on reddit.
Having one program (process) talk to another is dangerous. Think of a stranger trying to come over to me and deliver a message. There's no way I can guarantee that he isn't planning to stab me as soon as he sees me.
That's why we have special mechanisms for programs talking to other programs. Instead of having the stranger deliver the message directly to me, our mutual friend Bob (IPC Library, binder in this case) acts as an intermediary. This way at least I can't be "directly" stabbed.
What's preventing the stranger from convincing Bob to stab me? Not much (except for Bob's own ethics/programming)
To work around this, we have designed programming languages (rust) that don't work if there's a possibility of it being corrupted (I would add "at least superficially", but that's not the main topic here). Bob was trained by the CIA in anti-brainwashing techniques. It's really hard to convince Bob to stab me. That's why it's such a big deal. We now have a way of delivering messages between two programs that is much safer than before.
The only problem is that the CIA anti-brainwashing techniques (rust) tend to make people slow. So we deliver messages less efficiently than before. Good news is in this case we managed to make Bob almost as fast as before, so we don't lose our own much while gaining additional security. The people who checked on Bob even made sure to have Bob do the exact same thing as before when delivering messages (using RB Trees), hence this evidence is most likely credible.
That's a great explanation! Thank you, I get it now. I always did wonder what exactly IPC was about. Yay for Rust in the kernel.
This could be interesting, a bit worried how this will effect existing binder in distros and DKMS modules since waydroid relies on these
Distros will work a bit at shipping the right toolchain the first time they ship a rust-written module, but otherwise, it can't break userspace. I guess they'll start by merging the close reimplementation to make regressions easy to track.
The C binder driver has been in the mainline kernel for one or two years at this point.
just because its in mainline, doesnt mean distros build them though we are now seeing more and more distros use them, binder/fs being enabled is not a given