this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
129 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3462 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Today I’m introducing a groundbreaking bill - the National Strategy for Social Connection Act.

It creates a federal office to combat the growing epidemic of American loneliness, develops anti-loneliness strategies, and fosters best practices to promote social connection.

https://twitter.com/ChrisMurphyCT/status/1681350024200962053

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People don’t realize how important this is. Loneliness and the fear of it is one of the biggest reasons why people fall into tribal thinking and extremism. Gangs, neo nazis, even flat earth groups survive because lonely people can find a sense of community in them. People don’t wear maga hats because they look good, they do it to make new friends.

[–] nekat_emanresu@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I completely agree, but this type of response to it is snake oil. Many anti-capitalists view our social alienation as a required part to keep capitalism functioning, and any superficial attempt to fix it such as this post shows, is just to make it look like they are trying to fix it. See regulatory bodies allowing .. everything bad.

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any attempt at fixing things is just a whitewash job? Whatever. We might as well all march I to the sea, huh?

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They literally said "this type of response", not "every response".

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So talking about it, getting it on the radar of our leaders, maybe allocating some resources, that's nothing-burger first step response?

[–] nekat_emanresu@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I didn't bother defending myself against your bad faith rubbish. Maybe you should properly read what I first said?

You also aren't giving clear instructions on what to do, but unlike you, I gave a strong initial direction. Our isolation is intentionally manufactured by the same people you are defending.

[–] T0rrent01@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

And disallowing... everything good.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Gangs, neo nazis, even flat earth groups survive because lonely people can find a sense of community in them.

Which is why conservatives are preemptively shrieking about this. They don't want recruitment to go down.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Japan recently created a Minister of Loneliness and Isolation and I wouldn't be surprised if more advanced nations follow suit. We've created a society that puts productivity, growth, and competition above all else. I hope we're slowly moving towards a society that realizes we can still be productive with less work and more free time.

[–] nekat_emanresu@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Our oligarchs know that it's more productive to control us less intensely and give us more time off work etc. The common mistake is to think they care about profit, when that's more of a secondary feature. The truly rich care about power, and maintaining it. They will demoralise their staff to prevent unions even if that costs them heavily, even if the unions will only lose them a million at worst, they would sacrifice 5 million to prevent slaves rebelling.

[–] T0rrent01@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

"Landed gentry", remember?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

if these actually work they will be dismantled immediately

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

A huge part of the problem is that people just don't have enough money to go out and do things.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This honestly just reads like a way to make some cushy DC jobs for the bastard morons of some mega donors.

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I don't doubt Murphy's heart is in the right place - he's been a big advocate of mental health legislation since his House days, and he was the congressman for Newtown when Sandy Hook happened - but I'm skeptical that the sorts of techniques we use to combat smoking or obesity would work on loneliness; it's more of a symptom of a larger problem than a problem in its own right.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Just as long as being an introvert isn't made illegal.

[–] BloodSlut@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These are all actually pretty good things. The issue is getting other politicians and the public to take it seriously and engaging in it competently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This is a good thing, but I have a free suggestion: it's the cars, stupid.

The US has been building it's spaces in a cars-first fashion for over seventy years now. Many Americans don't even know what it's like to live in a world where walking and biking is the norm. In the rest of the world, in urban and suburban areas, community third spaces are easily (and by easy, I mean convenient and safe) accessible by bike or foot. In the US, there's almost nothing that's a safe, enjoyable walk from my home, and that's a pretty typical suburban experience by design. If I want to go do something or be somewhere where other people are, I practically have to drive. I hate driving, so I try to avoid it if I can. That usually just translates into not going out. I think that's how it is for a lot of people; being outside in the US' built environments just kinda sucks.

On the other hand, I've had a few exchange students from Europe and Japan, and consistently the biggest culture shock for them is how car dependent (and isolated) we are. The kids really feel the difference because they can't drive, and they go from being able to use bikes and mass transit to go places and hang out to being fully dependent on being driven around to go anywhere. As for Third spaces serve the important role of being the space set aside just for socializing. I'm sure everyone has seen/heard the grievances between the genders of how women can't work/shop/exist without being approached romantically, and men begging the question of when they can approach women, then. I am confident this is largely a US phenomenon, because we have pitifully few third spaces, where romantic approaches generally tend to be more acceptable. You want to fix loneliness? Start by making our cities not suck for humans, and start adding more third spaces like parks and stuff.

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not arguing for car dependency, and it is component to the loneliness epidemic, but it's not the sole cause. More than 1 in 10 Europeans are lonely, so car dependency can't be the only factor.

This widespread loneliness has really only hit its stride in earnest in the last decade or so. And what hit the scene about 10 years ago? Social media, ironically. The thing that is ostensibly designed to connect us has pushed us apart.

We can't have an honest conversation about this without identifying who it affects the most: young men. As a crude metric, /r/ForeverAlone has literally an order of magnitude more users than /r/ForeverAloneWomen. Not to put too fine a point on it, but the latter subreddit literally banned male users because the female users were getting asked out on dates ... literally this meme.

Which brings me to dating apps. They have insanely lopsided demographics that make half of all men who use them persona non grata. They have a greater matching inequality than the economic inequality of Venezuela. This is not a comfortable conversation to have, but ignoring it won't help solve the problem.

Speaking of the economy, that sure isn't helping either. What limited opportunities for real-world social interaction still exist are becoming less and less accessible when more and more people have to spend more of their time earning piss-all income just to scrape by.

The loneliness epidemic is a coalescence of these, and other factors, that have been accumulating over decades of consolidating organic social opportunities into overorganized spaces with inherent and high barriers to entry.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem in Portland is that we decriminalized most drugs, so now potential third spaces are over-run with homeless tents and drug use.

From my house I have either a 1/4 mile uphill walk to a major busline, or a 3/4 mile downhill walk to one. Either way isn't particularly safe, and the bus lines themselves aren't particularly safe.

https://www.koin.com/news/passenger-violence-increasing-at-trimet-during-severe-staffing-shortage/

[–] tallwookie@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

yep, same up here in Seattle, many green spaces are fenced off - now no one can enjoy the parks because the local authorities wont do anything about the homeless trash smoking fentanyl in the streets. every time I have to go downtown I have to plot a route from the bus stop through the zombies. it's ridiculous.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem in Portland is that we decriminalized most drugs, so now potential third spaces are over-run with homeless tents and drug use.

From my house I have either a 1/4 mile uphill walk to a major busline, or a 3/4 mile downhill walk to one. Either way isn't particularly safe, and the bus lines themselves aren't particularly safe.

https://www.koin.com/news/passenger-violence-increasing-at-trimet-during-severe-staffing-shortage/

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Crazy idea: if drugs are decriminalized, what if we had two versions of public spaces: one that disallows use of drugs, and one where drugs were allowed and handed out for free? Like if you were a drug addict, would you really want to go to that boring "sober" library where you might get hassled when you could get unlimited drugs at the library across the street?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because people who are out of their minds on drugs typically aren't aware of any sorts of public restrictions. That's currently the problem in Portland:

https://apnews.com/article/portland-ada-lawsuit-homeless-tents-sidewalks-aee2d079440d5f9427a18d9e4771d92a

We can't get them to comply with relatively basic requests like "don't block sidewalks". You honestly think they'll stick to "keep your drugs in the beer garden"?

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why would they take the drugs and leave elsewhere, which takes time, when they could consume them right there on the comfy beer garden lounge chairs?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, meth use is not conducive to staying in one place. Frequent Portland problem:

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2021/11/the-new-meth/620174/

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Oh wow! Ok then, free heroin at the Beer-and-Heroin Garden, free meth at the center of the Great Nature (and Meth) Preserve - swim up a waterfall, wrestle a bear, whatever. Free (one-way) weed shuttle bus provided.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would I want my tax money going to buy drugs for junkies?

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Drugs are fucking cheap if you control the means of production. For less than $10 a day you can keep homeless drug addicts off your buses, out of your train stations, out of your libraries and playgrounds and out of tent cities in middle of town, simply by luring them to a no-strings-attached watering hole out of your line of sight.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

$10/day adds up over time and area.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Cheaper than paying police and paying staff to clean up the buses and paying insurance and inconvenience for all the petty break-ins and smashed car windows.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago
[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Holy fuck thats a lot of government overreach. Hope this hack gets voted out of office soon

load more comments
view more: next ›