this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
123 points (99.2% liked)

United Kingdom

4094 readers
129 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If you need another reason to not vote Tory!

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Sacked for suggesting that the UK encourage people to take a long break from killing each other. This is truly the worst of possible timelines.

[–] florge@feddit.uk 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like something like you'd hear an authoritarian regime doing. I get the idea of backing the party line, but this seems a step too far. Discourse should be encouraged not shunned.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Much as I dislike the Tories, this his how cabinet government works, you are meant to discuss internally and then take ‘collective responsibility’ once the policy is decided.

Not really surprising that, if you don’t follow the Goverment line, you lose the government position.

Note - he remains an MP and now a lot freer to speak his mind in parliament

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 25 points 1 year ago

A tory with balls, good for him.

[–] MDZA@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What did we expect from the nasty party? Of course they support Israel’s right to bomb civilians and starve children.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Sounds like he's a man of principle. What's he doing with the Tories?

[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago

From Sunak's meeting with Netanyahu it's clear that Sunak is Israel's poodle.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Tory MP Paul Bristow has been sacked from his Government job after breaking ranks to publicly urge Rishi Sunak to push for a “permanent ceasefire” in Gaza.

He has said that Palestinian civilians are facing a “collective punishment” as a result of Israel’s siege and airstrikes campaign in the wake of Hamas’s bloodshed.

Much has been made of the splits in Labour over Sir Keir Starmer’s position on the conflict between Israel and Gaza but the sacking is evidence of Tory divisions too.

He wrote that he is “deeply briefed by the heart-breaking and devastating humanitarian crisis” unfolding in Gaza, having spoken with constituents and meeting with the Peterborough Joint Mosques Council.

The MP said he welcomed Mr Sunak calling for what he has termed “specific pauses” in the fighting to allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza, home to more than two million people.

But Mr Bristow added: “A permanent ceasefire would save lives and allow for a continued column of humanitarian aid (to) reach the people who need it the most.


The original article contains 327 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 47%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Conflicted by this.

One part of me thinks it's ridiculous that he has ultimately been fired for holding his opinion, and an opinion that many (myself included) hold.

The other part understands why he had to go, and whilst I don't agree with it, he must also have understood what it meant to publicly disagree with the party on this one. I can respect that.