this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
162 points (86.8% liked)

Android

17682 readers
10 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 133 points 1 year ago (5 children)

They compared the $130 TB4 Apple cable to $5 junk cables, but I wish they included some $40-80 competitors in the comparison. How does Anker fare?

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 95 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's the kind of article you write when you want to be sure Apple comes out looking good.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah...so it's a commercial disguised as an article.

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To me it is, could just be the guy who wrote it really likes Apple though. Who actually thought the 3 dollar cables were the same as the 140 dollar cable?

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

If he really likes Apple products because they are supposedly superior, why not show that by comparing them to actual Apple competitor products instead of dollar store stuff?

[–] Established_Trial@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know a shocking number of people who think they’re just as good, and they can’t be convinced otherwise!

I generally never believe a product is worth what apple is charging.

However, I also expect that the spin and salesmanship required to sell a five dollar cable as a 140 dollar cable is beyond even what Apple is willing to do. So I agree 100% it would have been much more interesting to see it compared against say a 40-80 dollar cable.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but honestly, it's only the very worst cable that the Apple one truly looks good in comparison to. For the other ones, it's better, yeah. Sure. 5-10 bucks better. Not 110+ better.

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

All of the others were just USB 2.0. Comparing them to a TB4 cable is kind of hilarious.

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Anecdotally, I personally love Anker stuff and exclusively buy cables and chargers from them.

[–] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I have a USB-C cable that was around the $40 mark, and it has bulky and robust connectors that likely house some electronics in them. I originally bought it to my mom as a charger/data cable, but she didn't like it, so I use it to occasionally connect my phone to my monitor. It transfers USB and 2.5K video signal without an issue with superfast charging as a bonus, and also braided. Not sure if it would fare at TB4 speeds.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Kind of curious about the Cablematters TB4 cable also as it seems to be of comparable quality to the Apple cable.

[–] doctorn@r.nf 26 points 1 year ago

...this cable accumulated 29 one-star reviews on Amazon and was discontinued the day after we bought it.

"Yes! Somebody real bought it! Quickly pull everything before they sue us." πŸ˜…

[–] ayyndrew@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Does anyone know of a decently priced, fully featured USB C cable that I can just buy a bunch of? I have to keep track of which high speed data cable came with my external SSD, which cable is USB 2.0 only, and which cables support high speed charging which kind of defeats the "one cable to rule them all" point of USB C

[–] DoctorWhookah@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was pretty cool. $129 for a cable is excessive, but I guess there is a lot of engineering in it.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I make custom cables for the film industry. Some of the cables I make are ave $250 and they’re not even smart cables. Those UsB cables are not just a wire they’re a communication interface embedded in them.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like cable type really doesn't matter for me since USB-C is mostly gonna be used to charge, and data transfer is something I hand off to WiFi or Bluetooth. That said, I don't buy cheap ass cables for a reason. But I also don't spend a small fortune either.

This article feels like an ad for Apple cables, Amazon Basics cables, and an expensive ass CT scanner I'll never need and hope to god they're giving those employees dosimeters.

[–] pacjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Nice read!

I especially liked the part with the wiggly trace for better signal integrity. Always good to see design theory in practice.

[–] EyesEyesBaby@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Interesting read!

All I want to know is how much for one of those CT scanners?

[–] Chestrade@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I thought the thumbnail was an illustrations of some minecraft skins for a second.

[–] TheLurker@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh look another paid apple advertising article.

[–] ijeff@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

More about showing off neat CT scans. I wouldn't read too much into it given the sample of cables looked at. I personally had no idea industrial CT scanning was a thing!