The same BASF "fleeing Germany" is actually bulding a completely new giant complex, the first of its kind, for battery recycling on industrial scale to establish a whole recylcling value chain for batteries and be mostly independent from imported raw materials, in Schwarzheide, Germany...

"Deindustrialization" is a buzzword used by Axel Springer SE from the moment their beloved coal-burning conservatives were voted out. And they will push that narrative (alongside a few others) in their constant campaign against the Germany government (the Greens in particular) to spread fear until they get their retarded friends back into office or we finally learn to ignore their bullshit.

[–] Jagermo@feddit.de 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This. Intel is building a new plant, as is TSMC, Tesla opened one and more.

Politico is owned by Axel Springer, pushing the Anti-Green and ultra conservative agenda. Best to ignore.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah it was the deindustrialize thing that made me as an average foreigner with no real knowledge of germany to immediately realize is bullshit.

[–] volle@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

This

[–] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's strange that this has been a talking point of the Right (I'm extreme left/anarchist and I've expected this development as well) and most people didn't take it seriously. Glad we're even more dependent on the US, now that their dollar is going to collapse. Yay!

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What makes you think that the dollar will collapse? Lol

[+] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml -6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

BRICS is slowly gaining steam, Saudis no longer selling fossil resources exclusively in Petro Dollar, African nations are calling for their members of parliament do derisk of a US dollar collapse by selling whatever dollars they're still holding, inflation is rising due to the FED raising interest rates.

Probably won't happen this year but I'd be surprised if the dollar didn't start dipping in 2024.

[–] Ooops@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

inflation is rising due to the FED raising interest rates.

That's probably the most none-sensical statement I read for quite some time.

[–] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah this person just lined up a series of completely idiotic statements. The FED raising rates lowers inflation, and inflation in the US is back down to 3% as of this past quarter. They also claimed BRICS was taking off when it's literally quite the opposite. BRICS is never going to happen with its member countries basically in opposition of one another.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

BRICS is never going to happen with its member countries basically in opposition of one another.

Can you lay out precisely how its member countries are in opposition of one another?

[–] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

I think your assessment of what the Fed is doing is either based on underestimating the complexity of the monetary system or you've been misinformed by people who don't have your interests at heart. Please check this comment where I provide a source for my assessment of what the Fed is doing: https://lemmy.ml/comment/1684511

[–] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Check yesterday's comment of mine: https://lemmy.ml/comment/1684511

Feel free to provide me with better sources that aren't like "everything is fine, don't worry, your money is safe and the Fed is doing this in your interest" without providing meaningful data to support that.

[–] Ooops@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Inflation rates are sinking. That's it. No need to also debunk your bullshit about why inflation is rising when it isn't. Or do I need to google the US inflation rates for you?

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, you're claiming inflation is rising because of increased interest rates? That's a first. Cite?

[–] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

One example with insightful graphs: https://www.lynalden.com/inflation-vs-interest-rates/

Some quotes:

At first, raising interest rates in the face of high deficit-driven inflation can slow inflation down, which makes it seem like it’s working. This is because the Fed can potentially reduce the rate of bank lending, and thus slow the economy down a bit, even as those fiscal deficits keep pouring in. In other words, they’re not affecting the primary cause of inflation, but they’re subduing enough other things that they’re able to push back against the primary cause, indirectly.

Over time, however, raising interest rates and keeping them high in an environment where runaway government deficits and high government debts are causing inflation runs the risk of exacerbating inflation. High interest rates on large amounts of government debt (>100% of GDP) will result in even bigger runaway deficits, because now they are dealing with ballooning interest payments on the debt, and this ironically pushes more money into the economy.

However, high interest rates also exacerbate deficit-driven inflation, specifically during eras with unusually large sovereign debts and deficits (e.g. >100% debt-to-GDP and >7% structural deficits-to-GDP). Each increase in interest rates puts some disinflationary pressure on the private sector, but also results in even larger public sector deficits pouring money into the economy. If those public sector deficits are big enough, then high interest rates can actually be inflationary.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Brazil has historically been untrustworthy from a geopolitical standpoint. Russia is currently invading another European country. India could be stable, but they have a long way to go in terms of both development internally and on an international stage. China has essentially allied with Russia as they invade another country and is projected collapse in population to 800 million by 2100. And Saudi Arabia is soon to become nearly uninhabitable due to global warming and their main revenue stream is being phased out in many parts of the world.

The countries that are "worried" about the USD as international standard currency are mostly countries that are politically misaligned with the west or are developing countries that want to focus their reserve in more regional currencies to help insulate them from international crises. Any other countries that are shrinking their percentage of USD in reserve are probably doing so to diversify their "portfolio" like any sane person would that holds significant value in the stock market.

The USD may lose value in the next decade or so, but until there's a concerted effort by the EU,G7,UN, etc. The dollar will almost certainly remain the standard. It's a massive and stable market that's still projecting population growth into the 2100's.

[–] EnderWi99in@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

BRICS is slowly gaining steam

Hahahahahaha

[–] agarorn@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Not sure what's so funny about that. China still has a bigger economy growth than the US (6,3% vs less than 3%). India is also above 6%. So yeah, these two alone will get closer to the US.

[–] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the constructive insight!

[–] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

The US's dollar is not going to collapse any time soon. The market is very strong.

Unfortunately, when student loans resume in September though, the US might be in for a rocky ride - and thus, the rest of the world too.

[–] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The dollar isn't even remotely in a position to collapse. Where are you getting that idea from?

[+] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.ml -9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't underestimate that red tape. Makes it very difficult / slow / expensive to do business there.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Yes I'm sure the problem is those pesky government regulations.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The claim isn't even true. This is a completely partisan political opinion piece and you've just accepted it at face value and are using it to justify a different partisan political belief.

The German economy is doing great compared to everywhere else in the world. They're on a path toward a continuing and financially sustainable future and conservatives are freaking out because one particular line isn't going up.

[–] Ooops@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But.... but... that insane movement away from destroying the planet we live on will destroy the fossil fuel industry and then soon we will all have to live in caves...

...said a fossil fuel lobbyist or their paid stooges in politics while ignoring all new technologies. Because only when they convince you that you need to fight for your right to keep burning fossil fuels and everything else will lead to a catastrophe can they continue to maximise the revenues from their technological dead end as long as possible.

PS: Also Axel Springer SE is now (since 2019) majority-owned by KKR, one of the big players in financials still heavily investing into fossil fuels... but that is surely just another coincidence.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I may not be presenting my position well, and thus am coming off as a right wing partisan hack of the sort that wants to defund the EPA. That's not my position.

A lot of people (mostly conservatives and big businesses) that complain about 'red tape' as a way of attacking various regulations. For example, people will say it's impossible to build a power plant because of environmental red tape.
A lot of that regulation is positive though. For example, even if the land is cheap, you can't build a power plant next to a nature preserve because the pollution will kill all the birds. And I like that regulation. The power people will of course complain as will the mines that were going to sell the plant coal. In cases like this, IMHO, they can all fuck off.

At the same time though, the 'red tape' that many businesses complain about does sometimes actually exist. That is, to do business you have to get endless streams of licenses, approvals, permits, etc for things where the bureaucracy and licensing process adds little or no value to either the industry or the population at large.
From what I've read, this sort of thing exists a lot in Germany. I've talked to a few people who were starting a business in Europe and they specifically avoided a few countries for that reason.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Doubling down on your credulousness is not really going to present your point better.

The German economy is doing great. They're clearly surviving just fine without the business of those people you talked to who didn't want to deal with their laws. Must not be that big a loss for them.

load more comments