Cool. And now that it exists, they will be increasingly quick to adapt it to the next pandemic. There are other coronaviruses out there.
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
41 points (100.0% liked)
Science
17 readers
7 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.
founded 2 years ago
These will never get deployed because the cost of COVID is a shared cost between too many parties and none of them will benefit from, and therefore buy, these devices.
We need strict air quality regulations to make developments like these plausible for real world use.
I imagine it's worth it in healthcare contexts, but depending on cost it might be worth it for businesses too. If you run the risk of severe disruptions to critical services, the argument for installing these in your building isn't hard to make.
2 years late
Still better than nothing. The virus is still around, some places more than others
As the article explains the approach is applicable to other air-born pathogens
Something like this would really disrupt my company's "I need you in the office every day" policy.
view more: next ›