this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

5 readers
28 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago
 

She claims that the decision that allowed a Colorado web designer not to be forced to create a site contrary to her beliefs extends to her view that only heterosexual couples should be married.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Arotrios@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not this shit again... already went through this drama with Kim Davis. She should be removed from the bench and disbarred to boot.

[–] SCmSTR@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Wasn't she that like, government-employed accountant or something that refused to marry gay couples? These people are so traditional, they have a learning disability.

[–] skellener@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

This judge should be removed/impeached immediately.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

This person is a judge, so should be capable of understanding legal rulings. The ruling in question only applied to creative professions. Not judges.

[–] Col3814444@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Won’t do your job because you are a Christian fascist? That’s a sacking.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's Texas, so there's unfortunately a decent chance that no one will hold that judge accountable.

[–] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

No it's all planned. Take it to the supreme court and, well, you know how it'll go from there.

[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's hope so. This is exactly what many feared was coming.

[–] 13zero@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Colorado decision was explicitly for creative works. Signing off on a certificate wouldn’t count, even under the insane far-right decision of SCOTUS.

I’m afraid because of Dobbs.

"But I have my own special certificate for my court and my signature is my creative expression of myself!"

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

has she been asked to perform lgbtq+ weddings?